Energy - June 2023

July 7, 2023

Energy – June, 2023: Energiewende

In this June Report, we will keep it concise, with a particular focus on Germany and its ambitious goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045, also known as the "Energiewende."


"The German government has set a goal to become climate-neutral by 20451. The EEG 2023 is the largest energy policy law reform in decades, and it lays the foundation for Germany to become climate neutral. With a consistent and significantly faster expansion, the share of renewable energies in gross electricity consumption should rise to at least 80 percent by 20302."


Germany stands out as one of the most advanced countries in terms of alternative energy. This achievement can be attributed to the influence of a Green/Socialist government that has garnered extensive public support and implemented its agenda with remarkable authority. Nevertheless, an increasing number of dissenting voices have surfaced, expressing concerns about the cost and sustainability of the program. Many individuals have come to realize that during periods of ample wind and sunlight (daytime), not all generated electricity can be consumed, and storage capabilities remain limited. Consequently, the surplus electricity is sold to other nations at discounted prices. However, the situation shifts at night when wind and solar sources are insufficient. During these periods, electricity must be imported, including from reactivated coal power plants and nuclear sources, both of which come at higher-than-market prices. This scenario translates into additional costs for consumers and unfavorable conditions for energy companies.


Deutschland und die EU müssen Billionen investieren für die Energiewende - und das in einer Zeit, in der seit Jahrzehnten erstmals die Zinsen stark gestiegen sind und damit Geld teuer geworden ist. Damit werden Investitionen in die Energiewende immer teurer - die Europäische Kommission schätzt aktuell für die EU ein Bedarf von 700 Milliarden Euro jährlich, wobei der Betrag noch einmal deutlich steigt, wenn man die dafür zu zahlenden Zinsen berücksichtigt. Nun droht China mit Exportbeschränkungen für Rohstoffe, die für die Energiewende unabdingbar sind - und zeigt uns damit, auf welch unsicheren Beinen unsere Klima- und Energiepolitik steht. Nun verbünden sich Energie-reiche Länder, die vorher verfeindet waren - und binden sich immer enger an China..


With the West asking more and more to decouple from China, China is limiting critical materials to Germany, adding another negative spiral to the picture. So, will it become the change or a barrel booster?

Are we going full circle? Some government voices in Germany are now pushing to end the War in Ukraine, so Germany can go back to the gas supply from Russia?

Perhaps in an effort to make global warming more dramatic, the White House (source: link)—yeah, the House on Pennsylvania Avenue—is pushing a study to cool the Earth by reflecting sunlight. What are your thoughts? But starting to mess with the solar system may leave us in the dark and cold rather sooner than later. For me, I accept the 1.5 degrees warming for the next 50 years. However, solar, wind, and all other renewables should be maximized in their useful use. Religious and ideological zealots have never improved the world for the better, but they have brought about change, haven't they?

Population growth will be a major factor in energy consumption, and here's another study (source: link) that suggests oil will remain the top source for quite a while to come.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.