Geopolitical Focus – June, 2024

June 18, 2024

Geopolitical Focus – June, 2024: The War for "Democracy" Isn't actually about Democracy..

The EU election results have shown a significant setback for the current liberal-green far-left coalition. Rather than reflecting on these results, the elite and ideological radicals have branded the voters as far-right extremists, using familiar derogatory terms. The EU, with its NATO compliance under the guidance of the US, may face stiff headwinds regarding current wars and migration issues. Time will tell, but Macron, already in a Napoleon-like posture, is challenging the French for a new vote. Ms. Le Pen and Italy's Premier Meloni, both declared right-wing extremists by the elites, see solid support. This supports the narrative that the political guard has lost touch. More good or bad news, depending on your perspective, is that Germany's AfD (the NAZI Party) has its strongest support among young people.


In other words, the much-maligned AfD is on an equal footing with the conservative center among young people. And clearly ahead of the Left and Greens.


Leftists assume that they have leased young voters. For this reason, many red-green parties are calling for a lowering of the voting age.


In Germany, 16 and 17-year-olds were allowed to vote in a European election for the first time. All the greater the shock for the left-wing strategists.

The US has a somewhat Biden-like approach, while the left-leaning EU block is called centrist and the opposition is labeled right-wing. It appears that immigration and wars are now supported by the peace-loving West, reminiscent of Napoleon's and Hitler's footsteps.

Overall, it remains to be seen if the left and middle block will continue the current policies despite growing uneasiness. There seems to be no indication from Ursula von der Leyen, who clearly sees herself as a centrist, while labeling all true conservatives as right-wingers. One thing is for sure: the US and Ukraine need her desperately, and here are the preliminary new powers elected.

A Ukraine peace summit in Switzerland, without Russia as demanded by Zelensky? Following an interview with the Swiss organizers, they admitted that the absence of Russia was a result of Zelensky's demand that participants agree to Ukraine's terms. Therefore, the entire meeting is a war strategy session, with Jake Sullivan and Kamala Harris representing the Victoria Nuland version, and the killing goes on.

The architect of the Libya debacle, however, continued his rise unchecked. First, he advised President Obama, then Vice President Biden brought him on board as security adviser. In this position, Sullivan followed the Maidan protests in Ukraine at close quarters. He was a liaison to Victoria Nuland, who coordinated US support for the opposition in Kiev.

Sullivan was a leading member of the Hillary Clinton team that launched "Russiagate": the false claim that Trump had secretly colluded with Putin. (translated)

And how about engaging some NAZI with Weapons, because of dramatic needs? Another Jake Sullivan move, if a Russian did that he would be called a Butcher? Another Cluster Ammunition moment, no rules for the losers?
And Mr. Biden becomes the most unsuccessful War President of all Times, with the G7 becoming a non-factor after the EU vote and desperately clings together in an Elite bubble, with the public disapproval growing.

The US military has lifted the weapons ban on the controversial Ukrainian Azov brigade. According to the Washington Post,  the unit is now allowed to use American weapons in the fight against Russia. This after the US State Department checked the Ukrainian special forces to see if they were complying with the so-called Leahy laws. These rules prohibit the US from providing military assistance to foreign units suspected of committing human rights violations.

Ten Years, the massacre of Odessa and the start of the Ukraine – Russia War, also called Maidan Coup. (German). If you study the origins of Wars, this has all the handwriting of the CIA.

On the afternoon of May 2, the fleeing Russian friends were covered with a hail of cobblestones, pyros were ignited, young women dragged gasoline canisters for Molotov cocktails. First, tents of the pro-Russian camp in front of the trade union building were set on fire. About a hundred people had sought refuge there in the meantime and barricaded the entrance. But the Ukrainian nationalists set fire to the barricades, whereupon fire, smoke and immeasurable heat spread rapidly in the stairwell. The besiegers constantly threw more incendiary devices at the facades; shots were also fired.

Several of the pro-Russians who fled jumped from the fourth and fifth floors and smashed them on the asphalt. Survivors were insulted, rounded up and beaten with clubs. Odessa's law enforcement officers watched the goings-on without intervening. It took an endless 45 minutes for the fire brigade to arrive - despite a distance of a few hundred meters. A total of 45 pro-Russian activists were murdered by Ukrainian ultras. The youngest victim was just seventeen years old.

Ukraine and the Western war mongers, while many people question the outcome or the strategy, perhaps the easy answer is the surrender of Russia. It is almost a question of DNA: freedom versus a restrictive government, or closer to home, Biden versus Trump, with a deep-seated hatred in the case of Ukraine forever, and in the case of Biden-Trump since 2015.

Could it be that the hatred is perhaps fueled by the same sources and originally in spirit originated with Manifest Destiny?

Provocations against Russia never stopped, under the argument that we cannot trust them and therefore need to eliminate them.

Some indications of what might happen, if you take the time to research some books: Russia’s destruction is a long way coming, as the idea of “evil” and non-compliance is unbearable.

Schlachtfeld Europa, oder, Amerikas letztes Gefecht : Gewalt und Wirtschaftsimperialismus in der US-Aussenpolitik seit 1840 by Bruhn, Jürgen
- Battlefield Europe, or, America's Last Stand: Violence and Economic Imperialism in U.S. Foreign Policy since 1840 by Bruhn, Jürgen

There seem to be no other plausible theories but to continue with provocations and escalations. However, Russians are not Native Americans, and the West would likely need closer to 500,000 to 900,000 troops to succeed. Missiles are on both sides; it is just a question of whether the first US or German missiles hit Russia and how they will cope with some missiles hitting NATO HQ or German bases inside Germany.

With D-Day celebrations ongoing, Russia had to bury its 25 million dead along the way to Berlin and, in the process, helped destroy the Hitler regime, probably as much as the Allies. You would have thought that with the end of the Stalin era and the Bay of Pigs incident, the two superpowers should have found some way of cooperation. But with the US no longer controlling China or the South American continent, losing Russia to Europe would essentially isolate the US. So, the Ukraine story was "invented," and there is another war, as destructive as WWI and WWII, in the making. Who would have guessed that Napoleon's and Hitler's descendants, led by the US, are trumpeting the horns?

Russia invading Europe—perhaps that term better fits NATO and the US if you look at the military presence. Since Ukraine is not a NATO member, every nation engaged in the war is part of it.

Zelensky’s war activism, in the build-up to the "Peace Conference" in Switzerland, saw the Ukrainian President travel around the world, using the D-Day celebration as a rallying cry for money, support, and the destruction of Russia. Biden apologized for the hold-up in Congress and the continuation of support to prevent Russia from invading Europe. It is all a lie by hegemonial forces to seek reasons to invade Russia, no question about it.

The reporting about the war does not include the actual destruction, the lack of soldiers in Ukraine, and the strategic/tactical reasoning about Russia. Yes, Russia tried to take Kiev as a response to the Maidan coup and to install a different regime in Ukraine (why did Zelensky not allow elections?), but since then, it has focused on creating a buffer zone to defend the Russian-aligned territories.

On the one side you have the Western momentum reports, on the other side the more restrictive sources warning of a potential WWIII? Why don't the UN, NATO, and EU take the democratic approach and organize a vote by the people in all countries, including Russia and Ukraine, to determine if they want a peaceful resolution or war? One of President Biden's 2020 promises was, "I know these people for centuries," but he did not say, "I’m a captive of the system."


Yes, while Mr. Orban calls for peace, he gets schooled by some US reporters in the Biden ranks. 

Renouncing peace means "accepting dying for Ukraine". Do we want to give Hungarian blood to Ukraine? We don't want it! We will not go to war and we will not die for others in a foreign country, said Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Fidesz leader, in his speech to the participants of the peace march on Margaret Island on Saturday.

He added: "This is the truth of the Hungarians," and now it is your task to "make the truth of the Hungarians the European truth."

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — A crowd of tens of thousands gathered in Hungary’s capital on Saturday in a show of strength behind Prime Minister Viktor Orbán a week before the European Parliament election, a contest he has cast as an existential turning point between peace in Europe and a world war.

War must go on, and some reporters are fantasizing in an almost bizarre and doomsday scenario, with a complete disregard for human decency.


Israel and Hamas have somehow disappeared from the news front, likely due to the criticism the pro-Israeli side faces among the population, as not all countries are singing the same praises as the US. But was the attack really a surprise? Perhaps for Jake Sullivan, but not for others. Finally, a ceasefire seems close, and the Biden administration took a victory lap, without the two actors who said, "not so fast."

"When it rains, it pours" is an English proverb. Since Sullivan has been taking the scepter for Biden in Washington, dark clouds have also been gathering over other parts of the world.


Sullivan, of course, did not notice the approach of the heaviest thunderstorm. A few days before the Hamas attack in Israel, the worst mass murder of Jews since World War II, he published an article in Foreign Affairs in  which he noted with satisfaction that the Middle East is "calmer than it has been for decades."


After the massacre, Sullivan reacted immediately. And in the online version of the article, he had the reference to the "calm" situation removed.

The Bilderberg’s, or the sacred secret ritual of an Elite, here is a list of the 2024 participants but there are no summaries or press conferences, its all secret, but I take it part of democracy.

So what is the result of this conference? What are the conclusions that the assembled elites have come to? What did all these people, some of whom hold official offices, discuss in secret?


The answer is: We don't know. The public doesn't know that. And it looks like he won't find out.

The elite circle has not published any conclusive statement, and the participants are also silent.

Is it too much to ask – in the spirit of democracy – that politicians inform the public about what was said at such an exclusive conference? After all, each of the participants has enormous power to act.


It is not absurd that in a consensus forge like Bilderberg, the reach power of the assembled elites is increased many times over. And anyway: How does it fit in with the face of democracy when politicians in office and dignity submit to a pact of silence?

Bilderberg is not a "secret world government", but it is clear that there is a political formation process of power elites upstream of democratic institutions. An influence on the politics then estimated in the parliaments is anything but absurd.

The Bilderberg Group, EU, and WEF aim to unite Europe, including Russia, to gain some perspective. Why can't Europe or the world leave countries as they are, with the prospect of a global economy driving towards a better life, whether it's capitalism, some social system, or a communist system? Who is to say which one is better but the people themselves? Learn how many wars Europe fought to get to today. If you think AI is for peace, think again.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.