Geopolitical Focus – March 2023

March 31, 2023

Geopolitical Focus – March 2023

AIs Joe Biden a world leader who is leading the Western world towards a utopia or towards a Stalinist era of power? While China has been traveling the world in Africa, the Middle East, and South America, and has recently visited Russia to strengthen its ties, offer financial and other aid, and secure resources in minerals, food, and energy (gas and oil), the US is busy keeping the NATO alliance together for the proxy war that Ukraine is fighting against Russia to prevent the creation of a Europe/Russia powerhouse.


Germany's industry is so heavily involved in China that it might be difficult to follow any sanctions that the US may impose, as everyone in Europe followed the US's lead on Russia. By now, all of Europe knows that the sanctions on Russia benefited the US the most, had no impact on Russia, and, thanks to a mild winter, averted a real crisis.


The oil and gas that Russia sent to the West as a result of sanctions is silently finding its way around the world, keeping costs bearable but still filling Russia's war chest. Russia, following its history, will not surrender. Putin might be replaced, but a regime change like in Ukraine will never happen, as Russia will not trust any influence that the US tries to wield.


The NATO East expansion, which is equivalent to an EU East expansion, is a pipe dream of the left-leaning globalist elite, which includes most of the hedge fund and PEG/VC culture, in their never-ending interest to gain more influence and power. ESG, inflation, and other current events are clearly filling their pockets. I cannot fathom shooting Ukraine to rubble; the endgame can only be the destruction of Russia. Good luck, Iraq is still Iraq, and so is Afghanistan, and both Napoleon and Hitler failed miserably.


So, what about the rest of the world? India and Pakistan have no interest in siding with anyone but will work with everyone peacefully. Taiwan, Japan, and our neighbors, Mexico and Canada, and the EU, which has no political mandate and acts as a totalitarian state, will be a real powerhouse. The rest of the world is no longer in our pocket.


At this stage, is it really worth having confrontational approaches, even within the US? Starting with the imprisonment of a former president on political grounds, claiming that January 6 was an insurrection, and jailing thousands of people, and bulldozing an ESG, woke, and green agenda on disguised infrastructure and inflation reduction act bills, and re-shoring battery and chip manufacturing, not to bring jobs back but as a defensive act to prevent being shut down by China. At the same time, destructive societal forces like Facebook, Soros, and other left-leaning political sponsors are meddling in elections and everyday activities. Note that Hungary's President Orban banned any Soros activity, which led Soros to invest in the US unchecked, much to the joy of Democrats. BLM and Antifa say thanks.


It is such a bizarre and busy White House, but there is no strategy or plan for an endgame. A Western utopia of the world disappearing under water because of global warming for 25 years, Greta Thunberg becoming an honorary science doctor without the slightest clue of science, and Democrats disguising themselves as fascists to discredit anyone who does not believe in ESG, woke, and zero emissions while the rest of the world, which we call dictatorships, uses and combines all forms of energy to drive.


Perhaps it is time for Afghanistan in Ukraine. Tell Mr. Zelinski that he is down to 1/4th of his army. Germany may send tanks but no people, and NATO's 25,000 are no match for Russia. If Biden sends active troops to Ukraine, Taiwan will inevitably become a battleground. Do we think we can build battery and chip plants fast enough? Perhaps humility and an end to NATO East is a small price to pay. Sorry hedge funds and Zelinski, the world is bigger and better without aggression. The Maidan Coup, if history will prevail, will be the culprit.


Mr. Biden, you may dream of being the world leader, but the world's jokester may be the endgame. Keep Mr. 45 out of jail and start negotiations as a real Catholic, humble and honest, around the globe and within the US. Currently, your party, especially the left-leaning part and Dr. Fauci, are the only fascist-trending factions, including BLM and Antifa. The others, with a few exceptions, are peaceful protesters.


Just as a freebie, using sporting events to coerce people to wear uniforms for solidarity and excluding them without committing a crime other than thought is a real fascist move. Sport is a uniter; see black people on soccer or any other sport, a real tool for social change. Do not misuse it for coercion of issues of only political minority interest. Perhaps if the US government (admin) were as politically diverse as it is biological, hope would be on its way.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.