Geopolitical Focus – May 2023

May 23, 2023

Geopolitical Focus – May 2023

While we do not know the number of casualties, there is a consensus in the Western world, particularly Europe, that only President Biden can bring an end to the war in Ukraine. However, President Zelensky has recently completed his latest mission trip to England, Italy (including a private audience with the Pope), Germany, and France prior to the G7 meeting in Japan. His purpose was to once again ensure the respective leaders that he is a champion of democracy worldwide.


It seems that his mission was successful, resulting in another round of sanctions, increased weapons supply, and potentially the training of pilots (with F16s from Poland). The United States has pledged its support and made it clear that the war will only cease when Ukraine has regained control of all territories it held before 2014. However, one must question the effectiveness of these measures. While the killing continues, sanctions are being introduced that further punish individuals who are not responsible for the war and commit to a still-corrupt regime in Ukraine.


Consider the image of the world, led by the President of the United States, obstructing an investigation into his family's dealings. Why would there be a need for a network of 20 fake companies, none of which serve any legitimate purpose? Additionally, the President refers to white supremacy as the biggest threat to the US and includes within that label anyone who disagrees with his views. Can anyone truly follow the reasoning behind wars fought in the name of democracy?


Yes, it is true that Russia invaded Ukraine after the 2014 Maidan coup, but one must not forget that there was a US President at that time who had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. What contribution did he make to NATO to transform it into a peacekeeping force rather than a tool for US expansionist politics?


President Zelensky receives ample support from the elites, the US military complex, and the media. Thus, more Ukrainians are being used, with their leader portraying them as heroic freedom fighters, as cannon fodder for the moralistic ideals of US democracy. Afghanistan serves as a poignant example, and the mothers of fallen US soldiers likely understand the true cost. Is Ukraine now an ideal democracy? Ukraine will always have a population with Russian heritage, unless Zelensky plans to carry out an ethnic cleansing. But then, if he achieves his glorious victory, who will prevent him from invading Russia? Certainly not Poland, as both countries share a deep-seated animosity towards Russia.


Could the G7 meeting mark the beginning of reshaping the world and allowing Japan unlimited military buildup? Is Hiroshima an appropriate location for such discussions? Would the G7 alliance then become the harbinger of global dominance? This would undoubtedly be a step backward, as it would exclude the rest of the world that does not share our value system. It raises the question of whether President Biden's struggles with opening an umbrella are indicative of his global perspective. Negotiation is clearly not his strong suit, which tends to align with more dictatorial behavior, as demonstrated by his left-wing administration at home. It leaves one wondering why he is not on good terms with Putin.


In conclusion, what is the recipe for uniting the planet? How can we avoid wars and adhere to principles of gender equality, sustainability, social justice, and other causes that activists care deeply about in a world dominated by intolerance, fearmongering, and the pursuit of power? The current world leaders are a far cry from individuals like Mahatma Gandhi or Nelson Mandela, who truly lived and governed in alignment with their principles. It seems to be all about "me" nowadays, so we must brace ourselves for more conflicts.

If you are interested in learning more about Russia,
here is an article available in German. Additionally, there is a letter written in German to President Biden prior to the G7 meeting in Hiroshima. As a result of this letter, there has been training of Ukrainian pilots on F16s, with the aim of having them ready by 2024, in the hope that the war will be over by then. One could refer to this approach as "Biden diplomacy," which is being implemented alongside sanctions. Perhaps an unconventional suggestion would be to have some drag queens negotiate with Putin, specifically the ones who entertain US troops and children.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.