The Democratic Party, Antifa , Intifada , and litigators —spiked with a couple of grandstanders—but politics seems to be the least of their interests. What is worse, the moralists seem to have lost their voice and morality. The moralizer, as Lefever noted, is often concerned with a single end above all others. This is more than clarity of moral purpose. It is a single-minded obsession that refuses to see the need for choices. But that is not really anything new. But where are the moderate voices ? Certainly not in the liberal, progressive media.
They lost an election on immigration and economics, spending and special interests, and still argue they were right. How else can you comment on all bills that matter? All Democrats are simply a "no"—party affiliation the only brain that counts, no debate but a couple of one-liners, established not by the members but the propaganda department. That still 40% of Democrats support the party is a dangerous sign of autocracy from the party that ran on defending democracy. If you understand fascism, Antifa, Intifada, Marxism, and litigative behavior are certainly closer to it than a couple of ICE raids.
The deep state, the Russian hoax and Obama —it has all vanished under the grand theme of "hate Trump." If there was ever an insurrection, it was the deep state hoax and the activities to eliminate Trump from becoming president. Would you rule out the assassination attempts as deliberate? The Democrats have a word for that: conspiracy. And after four years under Biden, suddenly Epstein and Trump are buddies—did the Democrats all forget about it in the election cycle?
A former Sports Illustrated model who was romantically involved with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein claimed Friday that her files. That is what the Democrats call investigative reporting? And the result: they accuse the administration of being paranoid of the deep state, reminiscent more of a Nazi state than a democracy, potentially still supporting the Russia hoax as real. Gabbard has repeatedly accused the spy agencies she now oversees of "weaponizing" or "politicizing" intelligence under previous leadership. She also announced in April that she'd referred multiple leaks to the DOJ for criminal investigations. "These deep-state criminals leaked classified information for partisan political purposes to undermine POTUS' agenda," she said. Just ask Hakeem Jeffries— never let an opportunity to smear go to the wayside. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is shocking some colleagues by fully embracing efforts to exploit divisions between President Trump and his MAGA base over the administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.
ICE raids are certainly worth a discussion. However, all the protesters and the army of lawyers occupied with defending people who crossed borders with no papers—"sans papers"—if they all would work on the legality of border crossings in cooperation with immigration authorities, would you think there was a way to make them either legal or send them back? In a time of Interpol and intelligence, you should be able to background check within the hour, and if someone comes here and has no sponsor, well, no entry. Start with the Farm Workers Union—they should know how many people are needed—but perhaps, just perhaps, they make some good dark money from the illegals. However, there is hope , but also the view that illegals are the victims. Has the president the authority to open the border at will? At the end, Congress at some point will have to address the issue. It will, however, take some courage—but that is why people run for politics. Good trouble will not help but divide in the name of democracy. Tens of thousands of people are expected to protest the Trump administration again on Thursday, the fifth anniversary of the death of civil rights leader and former congressman John Lewis.
Coined by civil rights leader Congressman John Lewis , "Good Trouble" is the action of coming together to take peaceful, non-violent action to challenge injustice and create meaningful change.
It is just another example of malpractice by politicians, but have you ever tried to sue a lawyer for malpractice? That's about the same as John Gotti's trials in New York —or unaffordable. And is the political landscape not occupied by lawyers, just a lower hourly rate, but the mindset is set.
