US Politics | September, 2024

The Walt Disney News welcomed the hosting of the debate, which was aired by ABC, a network owned by Disney. This raised concerns about controlling the narrative. The chairwoman of ABC, Dana Walden , is not just a donor, but a long-time friend of Democratic politicians. Does this smell of election interference or party favors? It certainly brings to mind Chris Wallace's role in assisting Joe Biden during their debate. Speaking of Wallace, where is he now? Oh, he's a Trump basher at CNN , another defender of Democrats but not democracy. He must feel relieved that this time, it wasn't an incoherent figure who was declared the winner, but a bully. That's okay, as long as the winner is blue—or should we say, a little more red? In Germany, they call this type of contradiction "melons" (green on the outside, red on the inside). So, what do you call blue on the outside and red on the inside? Google it, most of them are poisonous.

Walden has donated to Democratic Party politicians and has hosted fundraising events for the party. [ 1 ] She and her husband are also longtime friends of Kamala Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff .

ABC debate hosts, David Muir and Linsy Davis , likely prepared under the guidance of George Stephanopoulos, the long-time ally of Hillary Clinton. It seems to take a certain "Swiftian" intellect to interpret the debate's outcome, especially after Taylor Swift herself endorsed Kamala. AI is dangerous, especially if it creates fake endorsements or "Swiftian" ideals. As for Swift, maybe her relationship with Jason Kelce is more about expanding her business to a different demographic. You can read more about her past relationships here and here .

Within just five minutes of the debate, it was obvious the questions were designed to put Trump on the defensive. Kamala appeared presidential, while Trump was painted in an aggressive light. But we already know where Trump stands on issues, just as we know Kamala aligns with the elites, war hawks, and the far left. Substance was not the priority—it was about appeasing those focused on abortion and the "blue generics." Don’t expect economic improvements after the election. Instead, focus remains on how Ukraine should defeat Russia, not on border security, the economy, or peace. While Kamala claims to prevent Russia from invading Alaska, Ukraine burns to ashes. Welcome to the Meta and Google virtual world, where AI creates the narrative. As for the winner of the debate? Don’t be surprised if opinions shift 360 degrees. And as Google and its allies sit near Alaska, they might want to be cautious about potential U-boat missiles.

Since Coaching plays a big role in campaigns, it wouldn’t be surprising if one of the most prolific consultants, Karen Dunn , coached Kamala while gathering insights into the debate’s inner workings. Having worked with Hillary Clinton, Dunn is skilled at crafting elusive answers and deflecting questions. She likely had an ear on what was on the moderators' minds through her extensive network of connections.

That outside Harris adviser, Karen L. Dunn, a high-powered Washington lawyer, has trained Democratic presidential and vice-presidential candidates for debates in every election since 2008.

The phrase "Ri(n)sible," loosely translated as rinse, blow-dry, and look new, brings to mind Annalena Baerbock’s habit of 360-degree policy shifts. By January 21, 2025, Kamala will complete her own 360, continuing as a California socialite—perhaps better described as a Leninist or Maoist. Or, as some in simpler terms might say, a communist. She finds herself in good company with the likes of Annalena Baerbock , Ursula von der Leyen , and Kaja Kallas . They view powerful men like Trump, Putin, and Musk as their adversaries. Kamala, after her three years as Biden’s understudy, seems ready to step into the spotlight—perhaps with a bit more vengeance than Obama. And who could blame her, given her controversial personal life? After all, she’s married to a lawyer who allegedly got a nanny pregnant, then had the child disappear. High morals indeed! But when you can pay hush money for such affairs, maybe it doesn’t matter. Compare that to Trump, who paid $300,000 for an alleged affair and got publicly crucified. Lawyers may have a credibility rating below that of politicians, but Kamala assures us she will reinvent the country. Let’s see how far she can go before the swamp consumes her.

“Doug and I decided to end our marriage for a variety of reasons, many years ago,” Kerstin Emhoff told the Washington Post in a statement. “He is a great father to our kids, continues to be a great friend to me, and I am proud of the warm and supportive blended family Doug, Kamala, and I have built together.” Emhoff’s affair with a blonde nanny, Najen Naylor, reportedly resulted in a pregnancy. Kerstin Emhoff, Doug’s first wife, supported her ex-husband publicly after he admitted to the affair. Naylor did not keep the baby, a close friend with knowledge of the situation told the Daily Mail .

The Cat Woman is not responding to Trump’s comment about how illegals eat cats and dogs. Is that more offensive than performing abortions? If you’ve traveled the world, you’ve probably eaten something unknowingly. If not, you can always visit a country where dog is on the menu and see for yourself. Read more here . If you have nothing to eat, and the choice is between a worm or a lost dog, what would you choose? Ask a fisherman, he might go for the dog. But the elite call such things delicacies, and the hypocrisy is clear when millions are spent on animal shelters while wars kill millions of people. It’s ironic. Some fly to Central America to rescue three-legged dogs while preaching about environmentalism. In my world, I’d rather feed the hungry. And when my dogs die, they’ll be cremated, but I won’t keep the ashes at home—they’ll go into the wild.

At least people are talking about Springfield. Maybe 15,000 migrants descending on a city of 30,000 wasn't the excitement they hoped for, but it certainly gave the media something to talk about.

Dick and Liz Cheney  are so concerned with maintaining power that they have abandoned their principles. The inventor of the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" hoax is now voting Democrat to continue their destructive policies. He must truly be an asset to the Democrats, even Kamala proudly mentions them both in her speeches. Well, typical, no morals, just a vote , so welcome to the fold.

Papa Biden can no longer cover  for Hunter once he leaves office in 2025. Should we really believe Hunter has turned into a sacrificial son to take the fall? The logical conclusion would be to plead guilty to all charges, get sentenced right before January 25th, and then either Joe or Kamala will announce that Hunter saved the country from more headaches and deserves praise rather than punishment.

They’ll likely reunite and retire together, living off government funds—democratic, of course, because the Democrats say so. Perhaps they'll even travel to Rome, making a large donation to the church to secure forgiveness. The Pope will surely offer absolution after a few Our Fathers and some generous offerings. Maybe that’s enough to secure a place in heaven, unless Putin vetoes it on behalf of the countless victims of global hegemony. Makes you wonder why Jesus used words to heal; if he exists, Biden may find himself chatting with Putin in the afterlife—perhaps in hell.

About half an hour before potential jurors were questioned, Hunter Biden’s attorneys informed the judge they wished to enter an Alford plea. This maneuver allows the defendant to acknowledge that the prosecution has sufficient evidence to convict, while maintaining a claim of innocence.

Prosecutors immediately objected. Lead prosecutor Leo Wise told the judge, “Hunter Biden is not innocent. Hunter Biden is guilty.”

The Catholic Church teaches that there is  no sin, no matter how serious, that cannot be forgiven  (Catechism of the Catholic Church). To imply otherwise challenges God's omnipotence. God's mercy is greater than any human wrongdoing, though humans still retain free will.

What is Project 2025 , and who is behind it? The Heritage Foundation  has positioned itself as a think tank focused on topics like war and governance. While some of their ideas might conflict with the Constitution, the project exists within the realm of free speech. To connect Trump with Project 2025 is simply an unfair attack, but in today's climate, even listening to differing opinions brands you an outlaw.

Project 2025 is a historic movement, organized by over 100 conservative groups to dismantle the Deep State and return the government to the people. Its Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, published in April 2023, was created by more than 400 scholars and policy experts. The book outlines policies to tackle the country's most pressing challenges, including:

• - Secure the border, finish the wall, and deport illegal aliens
• - De-weaponize the federal government by increasing accountability of the FBI and DOJ
• - Unleash American energy production to reduce energy prices
• - Cut government spending to reduce inflation
• - Make federal bureaucrats more accountable to the President and Congress
• - Improve education by transferring control from DC bureaucrats to parents and local governments
• - Ban biological males from competing in women's sports
  
  

Trump's team acknowledged that Project 2025 aligns well with his Agenda 47 proposals [10] [86] , but the project has caused friction with his campaign, which prefers to avoid specific policies. [60]  Trump has never publicly endorsed Project 2025. In November 2023, his campaign, without directly mentioning it, said, "Policy recommendations from external allies are just that—recommendations." [54] [94] [95]

Read Agenda 47  —every voter should compare it to Harris's proposals.

It’s the economy, stupid,  and Mark Cuban  believes Kamala is the better economist. He must be eyeing a government role under her administration. Give him credit as an entrepreneur, but if he’s counting on Shark Tank becoming a government platform, it’s questionable. Now he’s asking if Trump has a plan to lower grocery prices—what a setup. You raise prices for three years, then promise to lower them, and people fall for it? Maybe Cuban should buy a couple of farms in Cuba. Kamala's ideology in action. Perhaps he’ll start a pharmaceutical company next; after all, he must be a  better chemist  than a real estate mogul. Would his portfolio take a hit if real estate prices fell?

The billionaire co-founder of Cost Plus Drugs and Shark Tank host expressed satisfaction with a deal that allows him to keep control of basketball operations, stating, “This is what I love to do.” But “I’m also self-aware,” he  said  on Wednesday, just before a game.

"If you look at the teams spending the most right now," he added, "it's not because of media deals. It's because of their real estate empires. And I have no expertise in that at all."

Elite communist thinkers  are leading the charge, spending trillions on teleprompter-led campaigns, dragging the "deplorables" along. Best example? The Cheneys—what's their business? Killing for democracy. Ask them why they didn’t share their wealth with their workers. "It takes a village" to raise a child, but only if you’re a Democratic donor. Think of what election money can  buy next to a teleprompter?  

Boeing workers claim  they deserve a 40% pay raise, bringing their annual salary to $105,000. Maybe McDonald’s workers should burn the fries and demand equal pay to the UAW. Wonder when Kamala will head to Seattle to lead the rally, praising those workers. The Wright brothers built better planes, and now Boeing is leaving astronauts stranded.

A little earlier, King acknowledged that Harris had drawn a crowd, partly by promising a free concert in return.

"Megan Thee Stallion has taken the stage at the Harris rally, performing her biggest hits, 'Hot Girl' and 'Mamushi,' with her dancers all dressed in blue suits," King  noted . "It's the clearest illustration yet of how much Harris is energizing the Democratic coalition."

We have a choice to make: a president with a record of good policies, no new wars, and relative stability, despite COVID, or a litigator with no record, taking us down the current path of war and selective "equality." You don’t have to like Trump to vote for him—just turn on Taylor Swift and let Trump handle the country. He doesn’t need your worship, just your vote.

A closing note on the Current US Voting System -

If a grocery store operated like the vote-counting process, all the food would come in aluminum cans to prevent it from spoiling. Similarly, mail-in ballots start arriving from September and continue until Election Day, giving officials an idea of the number of ballots to expect. A proper system of checkers, counters, and auditors should be planned accordingly. The process is fundamentally one of math and logistics. So, who are the individuals responsible for this process, and why does it seem to fail year after year? A search for "who qualifies as a vote counter" yields no clear results. In an ideal system, an independent panel would deliver the final results to the press the morning after the ballots are fully counted.

Counting mail ballots takes more time because there are more steps involved. A variety of security measures, including signature verification and ensuring that voters did not also try to vote in person, are required. Election officials must open the ballots and flatten them out before they can be put in a tabulator to be counted.