Geopolitical Focus – November 2022

November 18, 2022

Geopolitical Focus – November 2022

The US election night has come and gone. Now we wait and ask…”will that change the world view?”


The answer: Probably not, as the establishment has prevailed and international politics will continue the path of good and evil, or whatever pleases the elite. 


Have you ever wondered what military presence the US has globally, and asked the question what is the purpose? When you run a Company, you ask yourself once in a while if your strategy is aligned with reality. 


For example, at the end of WWII, Europe set its focus on peace and prosperity. Since then, Western Countries have resolved all conflicts peacefully… And although each has maintained its military forces, these efforts have been more or less successful. 

With the development and extension of the EU & NATO, Kosovo and its related countries were the most significant occurrence in extended Europe. And the conflict was by definition a tribal war, perhaps instigated, but more to that in another write-up.

In its current form, the EU is in an excellent position, with no mandate nor political power, but with aggression and pure totalitarian intent, to ruin it all. 



The definition of EU is not a European Parliament with power over the individual Countries, but by his own definition:

By definition - As enshrined in the Treaty on European Union, ‘the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.’ These values are an integral part of the European way of life.

Human dignity must be respected, protected, and constitutes the real basis of fundamental rights.

Being a European citizen also means enjoying political rights. Every adult EU citizen has the right to stand as a candidate and to vote in elections to the European Parliament, whether in their country of residence or country of origin.

Equality is about equal rights for all citizens before the law. The principle of equality between women and men underpins all European policies and is the basis for European integration. It applies in all areas.

The EU is based on the rule of law. Everything the EU does is founded on treaties, which are voluntarily and democratically agreed by its member countries. Law and justice are upheld by an independent judiciary. The EU countries have given final jurisdiction in matters of EU law to the European Court of Justice, whose judgments have to be respected by all.

If you read historians and scholars of the subject, there has been an on-going debate if the EU should be guided by its members, or if the EU itself is the central government for EU Members? Essentially, you must ask “who are these decisions being made by and for?”

The latest developments and aggressive tactics of the EU Leadership show that they are clearly focused on a central leader (dictatorship) as the US’s current government tries to take central control of individual States.

With the most recent War in Ukraine, the EU/NATO alliance under the guidance of the US has become a Union of War, not Peace. Russia is and always has been part of Europe, and has fought for the freedom from unwanted regimes as has the US or UK, but also had its own internal and external conflicts with lots of human suffering. 

It is therefore astonishing to me, after the 2014 Maidan Coup, which was clearly a violation of International Law, (=War Crime) the EU has not taken an aggressive stand to avoid a conflict.

With all the current international issues, energy, infrastructure, labor shortage, supply chain, inflation, and national deficits… Do we really need wars other than to deflect from the real problems? The fight for democracy has not worked in any of the previously attempted wars and would be a parody of the EU, overusing its power as an autocratic one.

While we fly thousands of people around the world to save the planet, currently in Sharm el-Sheikh Egypt, all the same people are enthusiastically supporting the war. Is this because they hate one man or is it the political system? Hardly, we have opened Pandora's Box, possibly unleashing a string of never-ending global conflicts.

So going back to the past military strategy of the US, and looking at the real threats:


Japan
yes, because we did not allow them to have their own Military after WWII – or Korea, Taiwan. Italy may have a reason for naval purposes, but Turkey can cover for that – however if Russia is the threat, it appears that all NATO troops in Europe should perhaps be in Poland, and the Countries in between Russia and Poland should work on agreements with the EU and Russia to guarantee individual Nationalities remain able to access to strategic ports and enact a free trade zone integrated with and within Europe. 

With that said, if you follow geo-political US policies, a strong Europe is at par with China and the US. The US wants an EU dependent on the US.  It begs the question, what is the root cause of US involvement in this war? 



June 30, 2025
Celebrating 250 years of the Army with a Parade , makes President Trump a King ? You can certainly debate if it is a good Idea, but a King, that is then called a Stratocracy , but calling Trump a Stratocrat, probably never heard.  Healthy again, well the US is probably the most obese country on the planet, and the most drug users at the same time, this is prescription only, not speaking of illegal drug, or over the counter. So give the administration some credit for cleaning out the pharmaceutical lobbyists in the vaccine advisory Group and get some independent and medical experts to decide. The new global order, with President Trump leaving the G7 summit early, without a clear statement, and a failed attempt to reinstate the G-8; (Russia is excluded since 2022) the G 6 without the US are trying their own power play with the new German Chancellor as the face and spokesperson , representing Canada and Europe, in an attempt to ridicule their standing and strengthen the BRIC coalition. Perhaps they took their advice from the Bilderberg community. But Merz, to keep his standing in Germany, must distance himself from Trump, as Trump is a person non grata in Germany . As of today, the Bilderberg Group is holding a conference at the "Grand Hôtel" in Stockholm. Under high security precautions, the elite circle has rented the entire hotel until June 15. In the German-speaking press, the discreet Bilderberg meeting has so far been remarked: nothing! The list of participants includes around 140 high-ranking personalities. Mark Rutte, (NATO Secretary General), Lars Klingbeil (Vice-Chancellor Germany), Julia Klöckner (President of the Bundestag), Christopher Donahue (US General, Commander US Army Europe and Africa), Samuel Paparo (US Admiral, Commander US Indo-Pacific Command), Albert Bourla (Chairman Pfizer), Richard Moore (Chief of British Intelligence), Sophie Wilmès (Vice-President of the EU Parliament) and numerous other actors from politics, business, science and the media will confer under strict Secrecy about big politics.
May 29, 2025
As a continuation of the summit in Helsinki , the following conference that included Presidents Bush and Gorbachev took place in November 1990 in Paris. The conference included 34 nations, each a part of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) . The conference resulted in the signing of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty by members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact. The states of the CSCE also made arrangements to hold similar high-level political meetings regularly to build upon efforts to prevent conflict, control arms, and safeguard elections within these countries. [4] Netanyahu, Israel’s Premier, invokes the Old Testament—an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Since Israel and its supporters portray it as the homeland of Jesus, perhaps the phrase love your enemies was forgotten when the British mandate over Palestine expired and the State of Israel was born—with official recognition from both the U.S. and USSR. With the latest escalation in the conflict and a vow to eliminate Hamas , it appears that the escalation includes the elimination of Gaza . Those unable to flee are seemingly treated as legitimate targets in what some interpret as a strategy to clear the territory for Israeli expansion. What about Trump’s plan to buy the territory and rebuild? That would involve resettling many refugees, but is that worse than killing them? Trump is turning his focus to the broader Middle East , aiming to unite the “non-violent” actors and build a peace coalition, thereby restraining Iran’s allies (presumed to have UN protection), who are often seen as the root of instability. So why are evangelicals supporting the violence —alongside the Jewish elite— while the Left and Europe begin to reconsider their stance ? Are all Palestinians terrorists? What is the true meaning of “from the River to the Sea” —a call for democracy or a religious conflict between Islam and Christianity? And then there’s the UN, watching? And the new Pope, pleading for aid —but peace talks? Only Trump? Shortly after his inauguration, Chancellor Merz made his mark on German politics by deploying permanent troops to Lithuania— you be the judge —possibly to support allies under the guise of protection. His actions won’t help global stability, and insiders in Germany do not dismiss the possibility of aggression reminiscent of WWII, now reframed under the narrative that Russia is the enemy. He will certainly support Zelensky unconditionally, using the war as justification to rebuild EU military strength. European Union leaders concluded a busy defense-focused week by endorsing a landmark plan to unlock €800 billion ($866 billion) in European military spending—though internal political divisions remain. Nelson Mandela, upon becoming South Africa’s president, emphasized moving forward together—not retaliating for the past. One reason for his divorce was reportedly that his wife had a more radical, vengeance-driven outlook, which he believed was incompatible with building a democratic society. Yes, apartheid was real, but reversing the oppression with retribution only prolongs emotional wounds. One has to ask what is just . Perhaps Trump has a point— crime is rampant . But of course, there are always two sides to a story .
More Posts