US Politics – November 2022

November 18, 2022

US Politics – November 2022 | Republicans winning the House

All the anticipation and hype has given way to emotional reactions, both positive and negative. However it is almost certain the democrats will lose the House, and this will create a better balance of power. 


What have we learned from this election cycle? 

  • The country is still split 50-50 in competitive States – with marginal victories on either side. As long as there are opportunities created to extend and accept votes after election Day (postmarked?) election integrity will be questioned. Interestingly, this time it shifted from PA to Arizona and Nevada.
  • Voter intimidation can have many forms, and I’m not quite sure how you feel about a President openly declaring opponents NAZI’ or racist and using Fascist tactics on the way. 
  • The media, almost all of them, including commentators on social media are no longer informing people but are government compliers. Thus they are a part of a power structure that pushes for what they call the Republicans out for.
  • There have always been extreme elements in political view, and that should be welcomed. It is better to have their voices open, then like Soros or Sam Bankman-Fried, who donate billions to push one extreme are tolerated by the media, while other opposing views are demonized and vilified. For what reason, free abortion and unlimited Wars? 
  •  Abortion and unlimited Wars; talk about election deciders? It is hardly a question of candidate quality, both sides offer good and party liners. We see two major factors; abortion mobilized the youth and the old “birthing people” mostly organized by the 1960 activists who are still living in the past with no birth control, to preserve their legacy, and their lifetime passion; secondly, the elite establishment and the War-Monger Bush / Cheney clan (moderates by Liz Cheney standard) needed to avoid a “Red Wave” at all costs to continue their influence. I questioned the united support of all Republicans for the War in Ukraine… As in my humble opinion it took all opposition out leading to the elections. The “unifier” trick? 
  • Has democracy really won? We will know when we enter the 2024 election cycle which starts November 15, probably with all knifes out. 
  • Economy: It was well played, Inflation eased a bit with the strategic reserve consumption. The War in the Ukraine was good enough to ease the GDP, perhaps the real reason for the War? 
  • International relations, don’t matter, especially if we plan to settle with wars if things do not go our way. 
  • Green Deal, Infrastructure, Student Loan etc.,  – people are happy for free deals, under the impression someone else pays. Imagine asking your neighbors to pay for you. 


The real winner, if any, is the leadership team of Pelosi, Schumer and the President. They orchestrated a media and political campaign focusing mostly on demonizing people, questionable facts, accomplishments, and a core that is only interested in retaining power. 


The real loser is McConnel, who sided (for reasons only known to him) for nothing. This leads to speculations, is he compromised? And do the democrats know? Is his allegiance with the War Mongers or has he simply put his ego above country and did it to take revenge on Trump? 

And there are a lot of little losers in the Republican party, like Lindsey Graham, who is almost as good as Biden to screw things up with a minute of TV glory. For example,  his comments on abortion. 


Going forward, the Republicans winning the House means that the most proficient and ruthless political person will be reduced to a voice,  and removed as the Speaker of the House. That is Nancy Pelosi. Give her credit for what she did, if it was good for the Country..  history will tell. But DON’T count her out, she works in the background as some might say former President # 44 does. 

For the Republicans – vote for a speaker that can unite, not a hardliner nor a War Monger nor a Rhino. ,

And then there is the Minority Senate Leader – he has been outmaneuvered by Schumer – Pelosi in the last 2 years, call it to compromise but he did not get anything in return? However as long as Schumer is the Majority Leader, whoever comes in will have to be on his toes, as his negotiation tactics are New York style. More so in reference to the Mob than negotiating, but that is a reference to the party he choose. Certainly, a new Republican leader would show that we are willing to take on the establishment. 


For Schumer, as he travels, his constituents in the press continue to congratulate him on the win. He indicates openness to compromise. Whatever that means is his secret, and after the CRT and environmental activists were traded for abortion in the buildup, we will  see how long they keep quiet. 


The bright spot in all this? Do we have another entertaining time in front until at least 2024. Or just better said; nothing new in the west?

June 30, 2025
Celebrating 250 years of the Army with a Parade , makes President Trump a King ? You can certainly debate if it is a good Idea, but a King, that is then called a Stratocracy , but calling Trump a Stratocrat, probably never heard.  Healthy again, well the US is probably the most obese country on the planet, and the most drug users at the same time, this is prescription only, not speaking of illegal drug, or over the counter. So give the administration some credit for cleaning out the pharmaceutical lobbyists in the vaccine advisory Group and get some independent and medical experts to decide. The new global order, with President Trump leaving the G7 summit early, without a clear statement, and a failed attempt to reinstate the G-8; (Russia is excluded since 2022) the G 6 without the US are trying their own power play with the new German Chancellor as the face and spokesperson , representing Canada and Europe, in an attempt to ridicule their standing and strengthen the BRIC coalition. Perhaps they took their advice from the Bilderberg community. But Merz, to keep his standing in Germany, must distance himself from Trump, as Trump is a person non grata in Germany . As of today, the Bilderberg Group is holding a conference at the "Grand Hôtel" in Stockholm. Under high security precautions, the elite circle has rented the entire hotel until June 15. In the German-speaking press, the discreet Bilderberg meeting has so far been remarked: nothing! The list of participants includes around 140 high-ranking personalities. Mark Rutte, (NATO Secretary General), Lars Klingbeil (Vice-Chancellor Germany), Julia Klöckner (President of the Bundestag), Christopher Donahue (US General, Commander US Army Europe and Africa), Samuel Paparo (US Admiral, Commander US Indo-Pacific Command), Albert Bourla (Chairman Pfizer), Richard Moore (Chief of British Intelligence), Sophie Wilmès (Vice-President of the EU Parliament) and numerous other actors from politics, business, science and the media will confer under strict Secrecy about big politics.
May 29, 2025
As a continuation of the summit in Helsinki , the following conference that included Presidents Bush and Gorbachev took place in November 1990 in Paris. The conference included 34 nations, each a part of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) . The conference resulted in the signing of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty by members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact. The states of the CSCE also made arrangements to hold similar high-level political meetings regularly to build upon efforts to prevent conflict, control arms, and safeguard elections within these countries. [4] Netanyahu, Israel’s Premier, invokes the Old Testament—an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Since Israel and its supporters portray it as the homeland of Jesus, perhaps the phrase love your enemies was forgotten when the British mandate over Palestine expired and the State of Israel was born—with official recognition from both the U.S. and USSR. With the latest escalation in the conflict and a vow to eliminate Hamas , it appears that the escalation includes the elimination of Gaza . Those unable to flee are seemingly treated as legitimate targets in what some interpret as a strategy to clear the territory for Israeli expansion. What about Trump’s plan to buy the territory and rebuild? That would involve resettling many refugees, but is that worse than killing them? Trump is turning his focus to the broader Middle East , aiming to unite the “non-violent” actors and build a peace coalition, thereby restraining Iran’s allies (presumed to have UN protection), who are often seen as the root of instability. So why are evangelicals supporting the violence —alongside the Jewish elite— while the Left and Europe begin to reconsider their stance ? Are all Palestinians terrorists? What is the true meaning of “from the River to the Sea” —a call for democracy or a religious conflict between Islam and Christianity? And then there’s the UN, watching? And the new Pope, pleading for aid —but peace talks? Only Trump? Shortly after his inauguration, Chancellor Merz made his mark on German politics by deploying permanent troops to Lithuania— you be the judge —possibly to support allies under the guise of protection. His actions won’t help global stability, and insiders in Germany do not dismiss the possibility of aggression reminiscent of WWII, now reframed under the narrative that Russia is the enemy. He will certainly support Zelensky unconditionally, using the war as justification to rebuild EU military strength. European Union leaders concluded a busy defense-focused week by endorsing a landmark plan to unlock €800 billion ($866 billion) in European military spending—though internal political divisions remain. Nelson Mandela, upon becoming South Africa’s president, emphasized moving forward together—not retaliating for the past. One reason for his divorce was reportedly that his wife had a more radical, vengeance-driven outlook, which he believed was incompatible with building a democratic society. Yes, apartheid was real, but reversing the oppression with retribution only prolongs emotional wounds. One has to ask what is just . Perhaps Trump has a point— crime is rampant . But of course, there are always two sides to a story .
More Posts