US Politics – November 2022

November 18, 2022

US Politics – November 2022 | Republicans winning the House

All the anticipation and hype has given way to emotional reactions, both positive and negative. However it is almost certain the democrats will lose the House, and this will create a better balance of power. 


What have we learned from this election cycle? 

  • The country is still split 50-50 in competitive States – with marginal victories on either side. As long as there are opportunities created to extend and accept votes after election Day (postmarked?) election integrity will be questioned. Interestingly, this time it shifted from PA to Arizona and Nevada.
  • Voter intimidation can have many forms, and I’m not quite sure how you feel about a President openly declaring opponents NAZI’ or racist and using Fascist tactics on the way. 
  • The media, almost all of them, including commentators on social media are no longer informing people but are government compliers. Thus they are a part of a power structure that pushes for what they call the Republicans out for.
  • There have always been extreme elements in political view, and that should be welcomed. It is better to have their voices open, then like Soros or Sam Bankman-Fried, who donate billions to push one extreme are tolerated by the media, while other opposing views are demonized and vilified. For what reason, free abortion and unlimited Wars? 
  •  Abortion and unlimited Wars; talk about election deciders? It is hardly a question of candidate quality, both sides offer good and party liners. We see two major factors; abortion mobilized the youth and the old “birthing people” mostly organized by the 1960 activists who are still living in the past with no birth control, to preserve their legacy, and their lifetime passion; secondly, the elite establishment and the War-Monger Bush / Cheney clan (moderates by Liz Cheney standard) needed to avoid a “Red Wave” at all costs to continue their influence. I questioned the united support of all Republicans for the War in Ukraine… As in my humble opinion it took all opposition out leading to the elections. The “unifier” trick? 
  • Has democracy really won? We will know when we enter the 2024 election cycle which starts November 15, probably with all knifes out. 
  • Economy: It was well played, Inflation eased a bit with the strategic reserve consumption. The War in the Ukraine was good enough to ease the GDP, perhaps the real reason for the War? 
  • International relations, don’t matter, especially if we plan to settle with wars if things do not go our way. 
  • Green Deal, Infrastructure, Student Loan etc.,  – people are happy for free deals, under the impression someone else pays. Imagine asking your neighbors to pay for you. 


The real winner, if any, is the leadership team of Pelosi, Schumer and the President. They orchestrated a media and political campaign focusing mostly on demonizing people, questionable facts, accomplishments, and a core that is only interested in retaining power. 


The real loser is McConnel, who sided (for reasons only known to him) for nothing. This leads to speculations, is he compromised? And do the democrats know? Is his allegiance with the War Mongers or has he simply put his ego above country and did it to take revenge on Trump? 

And there are a lot of little losers in the Republican party, like Lindsey Graham, who is almost as good as Biden to screw things up with a minute of TV glory. For example,  his comments on abortion. 


Going forward, the Republicans winning the House means that the most proficient and ruthless political person will be reduced to a voice,  and removed as the Speaker of the House. That is Nancy Pelosi. Give her credit for what she did, if it was good for the Country..  history will tell. But DON’T count her out, she works in the background as some might say former President # 44 does. 

For the Republicans – vote for a speaker that can unite, not a hardliner nor a War Monger nor a Rhino. ,

And then there is the Minority Senate Leader – he has been outmaneuvered by Schumer – Pelosi in the last 2 years, call it to compromise but he did not get anything in return? However as long as Schumer is the Majority Leader, whoever comes in will have to be on his toes, as his negotiation tactics are New York style. More so in reference to the Mob than negotiating, but that is a reference to the party he choose. Certainly, a new Republican leader would show that we are willing to take on the establishment. 


For Schumer, as he travels, his constituents in the press continue to congratulate him on the win. He indicates openness to compromise. Whatever that means is his secret, and after the CRT and environmental activists were traded for abortion in the buildup, we will  see how long they keep quiet. 


The bright spot in all this? Do we have another entertaining time in front until at least 2024. Or just better said; nothing new in the west?

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.