Global News, August 2025: Zelensky, Putin, and the Alaska Summit: What’s Really at Stake

August 20, 2025
Edited Zelensky Ukraine Commentary

Dictator Zelensky, in preparation for the Putin–Trump summit in Alaska , will do anything together with the European leadership to have the talks fail , and he still believes Ukraine can win this fight with the help of grandfathers (to make up for desertions ). Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, cast the push as an attempt to shape the narrative at the Trump-Putin summit, showing that "Russia is advancing while Ukraine is losing ground" in the hope Mr Trump will back Putin's terms . That may be true, but it does not change the reality on the ground. Ukrainian concertgoers in Kharkiv. Despite the city's proximity to Russia, life can seem almost normal - Eduardo Soteras/The Telegraph. "The entire defense line is like a sieve," wrote Stansislav Bunyatov, a Ukrainian serviceman and blogger, a sentiment echoed by Borden Krotevhych, former chief of the Azov Brigade. Against the public's will and simply converting money into ammunition that explodes in his own face. Ukraine, without massive Western troops, will lose this war, and who supplies troops other than the US army? The EU may send uniformed people, but not warriors for a ground slaughter.

When people like General Keane represent the old Cold War theories, the world has changed. This is a conflict that started in 1990 with never-ending NATO expansion and escalated into a war in 2022 with the help of a demented US president, the neocons, and a puppet called Zelensky—none of them willing to negotiate. Here is a map that shows the desperation of Ukraine losing ground. All the US media still offers is "Ukraine has a chance." The best was a Boris Johnson interview— the one loser of Europe. Like it or not, the US–Russia summit will get a framework (the West needs Russia away from BRICS) for cooperation, and ultimately, the red regions in the map will be autonomous regions—mostly Russians anyhow—and the west of Ukraine, well, the AZOV base can align with the EU. The hype about Russia invading Europe is like claiming Stalin started the war against Germany in 1942 with the counteroffensive. Operation Barbarossa , the German invasion of the Soviet Union, had begun brilliantly on June 22, 1941. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/hitler-vs-stalin-how-russia-defeated-nazi-germany-gates-moscow-47577 Encirclement after encirclement had inflicted almost 4 million casualties on the huge but disorganized Soviet armies. By early October, they had advanced to within 200 miles of Moscow. Now came Operation Typhoon, the offensive to seize the Soviet capital and—or so the Germans hoped—end the campaign.

Here is a recap of key dates (you need to translate, and it is a Russian view—if interested, read some of the comments as well) —just in case, the war did not start in 2022 but after 1945. And the US "special interests": Washington elites – of both parties – are clutching their pearls at the prospect of the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska. "He's Putin's stooge!" scream Trump Derangement Syndrome Democrats. "He'll betray Ukraine to get a deal!"

Scream the forever war Republican Neocons. "He'll abandon America First and get us embroiled in Europe's problem!" scream the isolationists in the Republican Party. Hopefully he ticks right —no more war is the most important. Just in: it looks that the initial meeting in Alaska was a start, and the mistrust is on both sides. The US media, for crying "democracy is at stake" for so long, looks like defending Europe now from a Russian invasion. What they are defending rhetorically is a failure to integrate Russia into Europe. Putin is a KGB man, yes; Bush the Elder was a CIA man. That is where the Cold War ended, but obviously George Junior and all the followers changed the tune. Perhaps for Dick Cheney , still the leader of the warmongers—Liz certainly gave her best to remove Trump. Next to Victoria Nuland, Anne Applebaum might be one of the biggest nonsense voices. Here is Dick Cheney's vision of a break-up Russia (translate). For centuries and to this day, by far the largest multi-ethnic entity is Russia. More than 190 nations, peoples, ethnicities and tribes live between the Baltic Sea and the Pacific on the territory of the Russian Federation – from the titular nation of the Russians to the Tatars, Bashkirs, Evenks, Koreans, Germans and the Tas, of whom just 274 people lived in the Primorye region on the Sea of Japan, according to the last census of 2020.

Hydropower —a resource still available and sustainable—and other than irrigation , it is actually not water theft but use of it. There are certainly environmental issues, but compared to any other energy source, it has the third-lowest CO2 footprint. China has just announced a new project that should basically eliminate the need for foreign energy—see the scope, only one word: gigantic. The $167 billion facility will require digging tunnels that plunge through high mountains to harness the power of a river that sharply descends through the deepest and possibly longest canyon on the planet.

For a global view of hydropower, here you have it as a map, and here in a table , but perhaps China with its wind, solar, and hydro might be the most sustainable in the long future. Here is an interactive map for all resources. And where does China get its oil from ?

Over the past few decades, China has steadily and dramatically increased its oil imports as well as its refining capacity. As a result, China is now the world's largest importer and second-largest refiner of oil, helping reshape global energy markets. So as long as the big project is not online, China will buy Russian oil and gas.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.