US Politics - July, 2023

July 25, 2023

US Politics - July 2023

What is the precise strategy of the US for Ukraine? During the NATO summit (attended by G7 Members and other Western alliances), the US President reaffirmed promises to support Ukraine. However, there have been instances where the President also promised F-16 fighter jets to President Erdogan in an apparent attempt to influence Turkey's stance on Sweden's acceptance into NATO. Additionally, prior to the summit, the US allowed the delivery of Cluster Bombs to Ukraine, a move that has now seemingly garnered acceptance from various parties. This raises the question of whether the end justifies the means.

(Note: Both the Turkish Parliament and the US Congress must approve Sweden's acceptance and the provision of F-16s to Turkey. Considering Turkey's NATO membership since 1952, this situation prompts speculation about whether it is a strategic move or a bribery attempt.)


Who produces cluster bombs?


Sixteen countries are still believed to be cluster munition producers, including China, Russia, and Israel. The United States no longer produces cluster munitions but retains the option to produce them in the future. A total of fifty-nine countries stockpiles several million cluster munitions worldwide. The United States has an estimated stockpile of three million cluster munitions. In contrast, Germany, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom, who have signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions, recently destroyed all of their stockpiles.


What does the Convention on Cluster Munitions say?


The Convention on Cluster Munitions (Oslo Convention) entered into force in August 2010. It has been signed by 119 States. The Convention bans the use, production, trade and stockpiling of cluster bombs. It also requires States Parties to provide victim assistance and to clear contaminated areas.


You can read the full report here.


However, the parties at the NATO summit pay great homage to the US President, particularly the NATO Secretary General, whose assignment was extended as the Alliance couldn't agree on a successor. This raises questions about whether the US seeks someone they can rely on with 100% ideological unity.


During a speech in Lithuania, Mr. Biden emphasized that the US has formed a coalition of 50 nations to ensure Ukraine's defense both presently and in the future. The coalition likely includes 31 NATO Members, Australia, New Zealand, some Pacific regions, Japan, and Taiwan. Notably, China, India, South America, the Middle East, and Africa are not part of this coalition. These 50 nations, often referred to as the Western alliance, appear to be placing their bets on green, renewable, and sustainable technologies, aiming for a future with reduced dependence on natural resources for survival.


In response to Russia's aggression, President Biden authorized an additional three thousand Reserves, bringing the total US troops in Europe to over 100,000. This includes new rotations of 10,000 troops in Poland, which has become a critical hub for supporting and supplying Ukraine. It's intriguing to question the necessity of troops "on the ground" in this context.


Furthermore, President Biden's promise to be around for the next five years seemingly guarantees a win in the 2024 elections. Despite the noise surrounding Hunter, it appears to have little impact on the media or political establishment. In the democratic process, this could potentially be a more significant factor than all of Trump's legal woes.


The Republicans are currently diverting campaign money to counter Trump's candidacy, but it hasn't diminished his lead. The nominee will face a well-funded democratic machine, backed by elite and left-leaning big donors while also claiming small donors, averaging $39 apiece. It remains to be seen if this money is well spent, as some may seek to radically change America and continue an elite-globalist agenda.


Certain Western news outlets have noted the unity among the US/NATO/G7 while also highlighting the importance of the Western world compared to the rest of the world and the unity among non-Western nations. This calls for the US and its allies to acknowledge that there can be multiple value systems, and a global world should engage in dialogue, accept differences, and address local skirmishes when they arise.


As for the press, there may be concerns about conformity and propaganda, similar to the issues surrounding Hunter and the Woke movement. People may perceive the climate change discussion as inducing fear about the end of the world, akin to a new Bible of the universe.


Let's observe if, by the end of the summer, the press adopts a more normalized language and fosters free speech for all, including diplomats, rather than promoting warmongering puppets in the administration. Such a change would be a beacon of hope.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.