Energy - July 2023

July 31, 2023

Energy – July, 2023

Burning Forests for Wind and Solar? Are we really suffering under the Sun or is it just political greening?

On the Greek island of Rhodes, it is "forest fire dry" every year: "Whether it comes to a forest fire depends solely on whether any person sets fire there – intentionally or negligently." Vegetation only burns at 250 to 300 degrees. At 40 degrees, a forest does not start to burn faster than at 0 degrees. "The fact that many people have not yet understood this is devastating. Some debates make me feel like I've been transported back to the early Middle Ages."

Auf der griechischen Insel Rhodos sei es jedes Jahr «waldbrandtrocken»: «Ob es zu einem Waldbrand kommt, hängt einzig und allein davon ab, ob irgendein Mensch dort Feuer legt – absichtlich oder fahrlässig.» Vegetation brenne erst bei 250 bis 300 Grad. Bei 40 Grad beginne ein Wald nicht schneller zu brennen als bei 0 Grad. «Dass dies viele Leute noch nicht verstanden haben, ist verheerend. Bei manchen Debatten fühle ich mich ins Frühmittelalter zurückversetzt.

While all the Climate activists and the believers in the doomsday scenarios including the green parties and left leaning politicians and media’s are touting every opportunity as Forest Fires, hot days as record on a daily basis, we hear nothing about other weather conditions that actually might be as normal or out of line as ever.

The peak of information about Forest Fires might have been Greece and Spain, but we all know that tourism and real estate investments are both keys in those countries for its GDP, and as California and perhaps Canada Forest mismanagement is the real culprit, its is more deliberate burning, and some even argue that in Greece the Forest were burned to erect wind and photovoltaic infrastructure? Well if Land is tight and you want to convert to Green, the easiest way is to burn the Land you need, it is all to save the Planet?


Here two competitive reports, one that is supporting the Climate change as dramatic as possible as quasi arm of the European Union, if you take the time to read through these reports, it may not be as bad as politics wishes? Nius.de in German but the Graphs show the essence, and here from EU Science Hub.


The supposedly steadily rising average temperature is also put into perspective: According to official data from the US space agency Nasa on climate change, the average temperature in 2022 did not exceed the value of 2015.


Auch die vermeintlich stetig emporkletternde Durchschnittstemperatur wird relativiert: Laut offiziellen Daten der US-Raumfahrtbehörde Nasa zum Klimawandel hat die Durchschnittstemperatur im Jahr 2022 den Wert von 2015 nicht überstiegen.


Perhaps the whole panic mode is nothing but political fabric to justify the global Energy crisis and its conversion to Green, that especially has thrown Germany into a recession as the Energy prices have stalled investments and the German Companies rather move out, and one preferred destination is the US as it offers great incentives with Government supported plans as the Infrastructure Bill, Jobs Act and others.


If you wish it was bit cooler, see Johannesburg, but that is certainly as well attributed to Climate Change? But that is once a decade, so still important to remember that it might not be worth mentioning in a conversation.


You may ask what climate has to do with Energy, everything as it drives the Energy agenda? A German transition in desperation, as in this report there was no mention of any positives but Government subsidies and shortage, and a daily changing plan, with the latest strategy hydrogen, but at what cost of the entire transition.


Following a John Kerry visit to China, to push the urgency the West and especially the UN (the world is burning) end of time scenario, China is going its own way and is under no rush to give in the Mr. Kerry’s plea to save the World.


If you think the Solar and Wind world energy will be sufficient, have you ever thought about the storage capacity needed, or the cost of a dual (fossil or nuclear if needed) system, but if Batteries are the carriers for storage, Lithium needs a refresher that could come in the form of a solid-state Battery?


The battery of the future comes from Switzerland – and will soon be ready for use. In October, the Managing Director of Swiss Clean Battery (SCB), Thomas Lützenrath, plans to publicly present the world's first solid-state battery in series production.


A single cell measures 13 by 13 centimeters and fits into most battery-powered applications, from power storage systems for grid stabilization to industrial and home storage systems to cars, ships, and, eventually, airplanes. The technology could outshine the previous lithium-ion batteries.


Die Batterie der Zukunft kommt aus der Schweiz – und ist demnächst bereit für den Einsatz. Im Oktober will der Geschäftsführer von Swiss Clean Battery (SCB), Thomas Lützenrath, die weltweit erste Feststoffbatterie in Serienfertigung öffentlich vorstellen.


Eine einzelne Zelle misst 13 mal 13 Zentimeter und passt in die meisten batteriebetriebenen Anwendungen, von Stromspeichern zur Netzstabilisierung über Industrie- und Heimspeicher bis hin zu Autos, Schiffen und später einmal auch Flugzeugen. Die Technologie könnte die bisherigen Lithium-Ionen-Akkus in den Schatten stellen.


It has become a bit quiet on the EV front, although our administration is still pushing the nationwide charging net, but unresolved issues remain and perhaps we will in 2-3 years find out that Batteries and EV’s are not the solution? See this article from the Manhattan Institute and think for yourself.


And here from the Battery experts themselves – it is not a real rosy picture, especially looking at the natural resources available?

For the ones worried about a disintegrating world from the Power of the Sun, who buy into the narrative that the hottest Day on Earth (+0.3 deg) are a matter of life and death may have been too long in an Air-conditioned room, thus heat becomes a real issue. Wonder how the people survived 100 deg days without AC and mostly physical labor in the fields picking? But here is John Kerry of the UN, he will make sure we keep burning, his name Jim Skea.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.