America's Role in Ukraine: Pivoting Policy, Peace Talks, and Strategic Trade Futures

Is Zelensky now running the world ? It appears so after his historic tantrum at the White House. Or is he merely a figure acting on behalf of the EU, Kaja Kallas, and European leaders (France, UK, Germany) to secure a seat at the table for “peace negotiations”? - Most likely, he is maneuvering to ensure continued EU support, including troops, while hoping that the EU convinces the Boltons of the US to send reinforcements as well. - Unfortunately for him, the US halted its advance in Berlin in 1945. Some on both sides may still be unhappy with that outcome. - Had Churchill and a real army continued, they could have pushed the Soviets back then.

Note: The longer this conflict drags on, the only real losers are Ukraine and Europe. It's time for the US to explore trade agreements with Russia and South America. Accessing Russia via Alaska or Greenland remains an option. Should Europe be left to the Romans ?

A Swiss newspaper featured an image of Mr. Murphy, who went on CNN after the meeting to ridicule JD and the President for their failure. Is he a traitor?

Note: Kaja Kallas is a staunch warmonger, believing only in dead Russians as a solution.

European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas stated, “Today, it became clear that the free world needs a new leader. It’s up to us, Europeans, to take this challenge.”

Here is an excellent analysis of how it all came to be and the potential long-term downfall of Europe. The solutions, however, may be much closer than expected , less costly, and capable of fueling economic recovery.

A final reminder: All US Presidents have maintained a direct line to their Russian counterparts. Why isn’t anyone talking to Putin? Because Axios says so?