The Western War Paradigm – Russia, Ukraine, and the Rise of Hardliners
And the Ukraine–Russia War will continue, as the war mongers wish. Zelensky will not agree to any territorial loss , so he will have to reclaim it on the battlefield. Another Afghanistan is in the making for NATO ideology—peace through war—fueled by the Western alliance of war mongers. Where is Boris “Churchill” Johnson? No matter what weapons the West provides Ukraine, NATO and Ukraine are viewed as existential threats by Russia and will be fought as such. The West will continue to label Putin as evil and claim he is losing , until Ukraine lies in rubble. It’s like the U.S. Congress—we agree to disagree—and it will remain that way until the next election.
Too many Russophobes have emerged, ignoring history and focusing solely on events since 2022, and this article likely explains the real intentions (you may need to use the translate feature)—the same goals envisioned by the West after the USSR’s collapse in 1990. Here is the latest from the front. Europe can keep dreaming, but there’s no winning this unless NATO or the “Coalition of the Willing” sends 250,000 troops with the necessary resources—and the shambolic German Army , led by 1960s peaceniks turned war mongers , steps in.
However, Kallas thinks differently than many advocating for total Western victory at this turning point. She considers what happens if Russia is—contrary to expectations—actually defeated. The Estonian leader suggests a plan similar to the Morgenthau Plan: dismantling Russia into many small states as a future solution.
We claim to be fighting a war against Russia in defense of democracy, while the Chinese conduct a trade war. Their Maoist suppression system opposes democracy and seeks to force its will on the people through global trade control. Yet now, it's not just China—the global trade system is being weaponized. Meanwhile, where are Zelensky’s supporters in the U.S. Congress? “As long as it takes”—but this time, it's our money.
Xi isn’t resting. Since the earlier trade war under Trump, he’s tightened his grip, spending lavishly on authoritarian tools like world-class censorship and surveillance systems. Xi is preparing China for a direct confrontation with the U.S. , urging officials to engage in “extreme scenario thinking.”
So, you may wonder: what’s the purpose of all these European think tanks like the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) ? Does anyone actually listen? Is this really strategic thinking? Look at their stance on U.S. military bases in Europe —it spells conflict.
For two decades, CEPA has pushed to strengthen the transatlantic alliance through research and analysis from their offices in Washington, DC, London, and Brussels, focusing on defense, democracy, and digital policy.
Perhaps their real goal is to advance war mongering agendas. But things aren't going that smoothly for China either— this leaked CCP strategy signals desperation. Despite global positioning, China remains largely a 3rd world economy relying on exports, where the poor see little benefit.
The Chinese Communist Party is trapped in a self-created imbalance—overproduction and weak consumer demand—leaving a hardworking population with minimal wage return.
Burning Teslas and political distractions, while Musk pushes the world forward, highlight the absurdity of global leftist rhetoric and anti-Trump sentiment. Here are German protestors at the factory, and the recent DOGE outburst —not a word on Starlink’s Ukrainian support. In leftist U.S. media, DOGE and Trump are treated as slurs.
Ahead of Germany’s election, the AFD (Alternative for Germany) was labeled a “Nazi” party and denied access to politics. Now, polls show AFD leading over the CDU/CSU coalition and other liberal, Green, and Socialist alternatives. The firewall is cracking—not necessarily toward cooperation but toward visibility. The CDU, CSU, and SPD still hold a majority. The AFD is about as “Nazi” as Biden’s claims about Trump.
Rare Earth and critical minerals —we have thousands of economists and strategists debating tariffs, yet few seem to notice we are on the brink of total dependence on China. The alternatives? Recycling , or these top 8 countries. We must pursue trade and diplomacy—but the West must lead, not follow. Zelensky can’t be the referee. We need Putin on our side—plain and simple. Australia gets the nod for now. But Greenland may choose to stay with Denmark—which may benefit BRICS.
