Economics – September 2023

September 30, 2023

Economics – September 2023

Will political turmoil or instability influence economics and globalization, and will a shift away from international relations towards political economy truly benefit the people? In today's world, politicians are increasingly taking control of domestic and international economic decisions, possibly with the intention of addressing global challenges like climate change in accordance with the Paris Climate Agreement and the policies proposed by the World Economic Forum. But is this approach yielding the desired results?


While China continues to chart its course and is perhaps the only country with a firm grip on its economy, questions persist regarding the rights of its citizens. In contrast, other "freedom" countries like Germany or the US demonstrate that government influence can have both positive and negative consequences. China maintains its leadership in green energy and electric vehicle development but also relies on Russian oil and coal, even expanding its coal plants.


Depending on one's perspective, the outlook for China varies. Bidenomics proponents argue that China faces significant challenges, as reported by NPR and CNBC. However, more open reports suggest that China may have turned the corner and is back on a growth trajectory.


In 2024, global geopolitics will play a pivotal role, with volatility evident in various regions. The ongoing Ukraine War will continue to demand significant resources and scrutiny. Some European Union and other countries may reconsider their commitment to US-led NATO efforts, with public sentiment possibly influencing their decisions.


Sanctions against Russia, initially touted as effective, have led to accusations of circumvention and assistance from certain countries. This includes the purchase of oil via India to sustain European and US economies.


Additionally, there is significant controversy surrounding arbitrary sanctions imposed on Ukrainian oligarchs. In Europe, these sanctions face heavy criticism for being hastily implemented and lacking robust evidence. They may even result in legal action in the US, incurring costs for taxpayers.


Despite perceptions of Russia's economic decline, such as a declining ruble, Russia has found ways to work around sanctions and adapt its domestic economy with willing partners, while increasing military spending.


It more than doubled its 2023 gross domestic product growth forecast to 2.8%, up from 1.2% in April, and raised its 2024 forecast to 2.3% from the 2.0% April forecast. Unemployment, currently at a historic low in Russia, will remain at 3.1% for the period, the ministry said, underscoring the acute shortages on the labor market.


And then we head to Germany and Europe, where Germany seems to struggle immensely on implementing the green agenda and the US ordered sanctions on Russia.

German GDP fell 0.3% in the first three months of 2023, compared with an earlier estimate of zero growth, as last year’s energy price shock took its toll on consumer spending. If you like to see what subsidies do check on this paper in one year, it’s a blueprint also for the US. 


Germany's economic forecast has been sharply corrected: an increase of 0.3 percent turns into a minus of 0.6 percent. The traffic light coalition is partly to blame for the recession (read red/green) Almost not a day goes by without the announcement of new crisis summits or emergency measures: refugee crisis, energy crisis, housing shortage, chemical industry crisis, de-industrialization, budget dispute. But the discussions and even the stylization of problems as a "boss thing" have so far achieved little or nothing.

On the contrary.


They have created new legal uncertainties and thus accelerated the economic slump. Many of the negative trends have been evident for years and the traffic light coalition would have had enough time to take countermeasures in good time.


But it did nothing, and that is why the economy is now slumping at an accelerated pace, instead of growing by 0.3 percent, the five leading German economic institutes now expect a contraction of 0.6 percent for 2023.


The industrial policy of the Federal Republic of Germany is particularly problematic. First, the traffic light coalition is massively increasing the price of energy in order to force the economy to consume more economically. Households are also under additional strain, also as a result of the shifting of higher energy prices from producers to consumer goods and services.


As energy-intensive companies such as the chemical industry want to relocate their production abroad, new subsidies are now being promised to reduce electricity prices. Low-income households are also subsidized. Energy prices are not falling because of this. Because of such redistributive actions, they are paid only through taxes instead of the market. This money is then lacking for investments in productivity increases and the repair of the infrastructure.


Germany's industry has been running on state crutches since 2022, when EU rules on aid to industry were relaxed. As is well known, the EU Commission must approve state aid. Their data shows that Germany has allocated almost half (48.4 percent) of all state aid approved in the EU since February 2022. As of 4 September, Germany had granted state aid worth 742 billion euros. They are followed by France and Italy with 22.6 and 7.9 percent of the EU total, respectively.


The "debate" on the federal government's data strategy at the end of September turned out to be a non-starter, and the recent call for a reduction in administrative burdens was a clumsy election campaign bluster. For the digitization of the administration, even state funds are being cut. The Digital Infrastructure Special Fund, which was fed from the proceeds of the mobile telephony licenses, will even be dissolved. The existing 4.2 billion will flow into the state budget.


The housing shortage is mainly a consequence of mass immigration, state intervention and threats from politicians with rent caps, nationalizations, expensive building regulations or long approval procedures. Recently, they have been joined by rising construction costs and inflation, which were partly caused by the energy transition and shortage in connection with the Ukraine war. Persistent inflation, in turn, led to interest rate hikes by the ECB. However, housing prices also include high taxes and levies of all kinds. But politicians are not prepared to cut taxes and abolish the requirements. Housing construction will collapse massively.


Uncontrolled immigration is becoming an ever-increasing burden on the economy. The overloading of municipal infrastructures and the billions spent on asylum seekers also lead to taxpayers' money flowing into unproductive sectors. But the ruling know-it-alls believed that mass immigration would even replace the lack of skilled workers, even though nine out of ten immigrants from the top eight countries of origin have no specialist training.


The traffic light coalition is unwilling or unable to initiate a change of course, which is why the economic experts' forecast for 2024 of 1.3 percent real growth could still be too high.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.