Economics – World Economic Forum

January 29, 2023

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is an organization founded by Klaus Schwab. Every year, the WEF holds its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The following is an introduction to the WEF, as taken from Wikipedia:


The World Economic Forum (WEF) is an international non-governmental and lobbying organization[1] based in Colognycanton of Geneva, Switzerland. It was founded on 24 January 1971 by German engineer and economist Klaus Schwab. The foundation, which is mostly funded by its 1,000 member companies – typically global enterprises with more than US$5 billion in turnover – as well as public subsidies, views its own mission as "improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas".

The WEF is mostly known for its annual meeting at the end of January in Davos, a mountain resort in the eastern Alps region of Switzerland. The meeting brings together some 3,000 paying members and selected participants – among whom are investors, business leaders, political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists – for up to five days to discuss global issues across 500 sessions.


Aside from Davos, the organization convenes regional conferences in locations across Africa, East Asia, Latin America, and India and holds two additional annual meetings in China and the United Arab Emirates. It furthermore produces a series of reports, engages its members in sector-specific initiatives and provides a platform for leaders from selected stakeholder groups to collaborate on projects and initiatives.


The Forum suggests that a globalized world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational corporationsgovernments and civil society organizations (CSOs), which it expresses through initiatives like the "Great Reset" and the "Global Redesign".


The World Economic Forum and its annual meeting in Davos have received criticism over the years, including the organization's corporate capture of global and democratic institutions, its institutional whitewashing initiatives, the public cost of security, the organization's tax-exempt status, unclear decision processes and membership criteria, a lack of financial transparency, and the environmental footprint of its annual meetings. As a reaction to criticism within Swiss society, the Swiss federal government decided in February 2021 to reduce its annual contributions to the WEF. The WEF has also been the target of conspiracy theories.

The cost to be paid by companies for a delegate to the WEF were $US70,000 in the early 2000 years, and in 2022 were $US120,000.


The World Economic Forum (WEF) used to be seen as a gathering for networking and meeting individuals from various industries. Approximately 70% of its attendees and members come from finance, health, and environmental sectors, while politicians from various countries are also in attendance. However, with the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic, the concept of the "great reset" has arisen, leading to questions about whether the WEF is truly a forum or if it is instead orchestrating a fundamental change in the world.


This year, two notable absences were George Soros and Russia. George Soros did not attend without reason, while Russia was disinvited as a result of a sanctions measure, making the WEF a more political event. There are rumors that Klaus Schwab runs the organization as a one-man show and functions like a dictatorship, only allowing those who align with his principles to hold leadership positions. Despite this, many companies still pay a large sum of money to attend the forum, suggesting that there are benefits to be had.


Given that the European Union has non-elected members, it is unclear how the WEF can promote democracy. Furthermore, as an elitist forum, it is questionable how the WEF can dictate the lives of those governed by democracy, especially if global governments and lobbyists are in agreement with the agenda and use the WEF as a coordinating effort.


At this year's political-economic forum, President Zelinski asked for more weapons and the EU promised significant spending support. However, no discussions were held on peace talks, suggesting that war may be good for the economy. Meanwhile, Al Gore and John Kerry, along with other financial groups profiting from green investments, promised once again that the world would end, with many followers espousing the same sentiment. However, as Federal Reserve Chair Yellen noted, this change may be only temporary.


A young leader in Danish politics proposed a future where individuals give their salary to the government and the government pays for their life, with a tax rate of 56%. Some liberal individuals may label this as a conspiracy theory, but it is worth keeping an eye on.


With sanctions against Russia and the decision not to buy oil and gas, Putin's inflation has increased, although it has eased slightly due to European countries reviving some coal plants and Russia exporting oil and gas that finds its way back into the Western world. However, this just shows that staying in power is the most important factor, rather than transparency.


The outcome of the debt limit talks is uncertain, but a dissection by a public advisory board instead of career politicians, or an audit by a real third party not associated with McKinsey, would be beneficial.

June 30, 2025
Celebrating 250 years of the Army with a Parade , makes President Trump a King ? You can certainly debate if it is a good Idea, but a King, that is then called a Stratocracy , but calling Trump a Stratocrat, probably never heard.  Healthy again, well the US is probably the most obese country on the planet, and the most drug users at the same time, this is prescription only, not speaking of illegal drug, or over the counter. So give the administration some credit for cleaning out the pharmaceutical lobbyists in the vaccine advisory Group and get some independent and medical experts to decide. The new global order, with President Trump leaving the G7 summit early, without a clear statement, and a failed attempt to reinstate the G-8; (Russia is excluded since 2022) the G 6 without the US are trying their own power play with the new German Chancellor as the face and spokesperson , representing Canada and Europe, in an attempt to ridicule their standing and strengthen the BRIC coalition. Perhaps they took their advice from the Bilderberg community. But Merz, to keep his standing in Germany, must distance himself from Trump, as Trump is a person non grata in Germany . As of today, the Bilderberg Group is holding a conference at the "Grand Hôtel" in Stockholm. Under high security precautions, the elite circle has rented the entire hotel until June 15. In the German-speaking press, the discreet Bilderberg meeting has so far been remarked: nothing! The list of participants includes around 140 high-ranking personalities. Mark Rutte, (NATO Secretary General), Lars Klingbeil (Vice-Chancellor Germany), Julia Klöckner (President of the Bundestag), Christopher Donahue (US General, Commander US Army Europe and Africa), Samuel Paparo (US Admiral, Commander US Indo-Pacific Command), Albert Bourla (Chairman Pfizer), Richard Moore (Chief of British Intelligence), Sophie Wilmès (Vice-President of the EU Parliament) and numerous other actors from politics, business, science and the media will confer under strict Secrecy about big politics.
May 29, 2025
As a continuation of the summit in Helsinki , the following conference that included Presidents Bush and Gorbachev took place in November 1990 in Paris. The conference included 34 nations, each a part of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) . The conference resulted in the signing of the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty by members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact. The states of the CSCE also made arrangements to hold similar high-level political meetings regularly to build upon efforts to prevent conflict, control arms, and safeguard elections within these countries. [4] Netanyahu, Israel’s Premier, invokes the Old Testament—an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Since Israel and its supporters portray it as the homeland of Jesus, perhaps the phrase love your enemies was forgotten when the British mandate over Palestine expired and the State of Israel was born—with official recognition from both the U.S. and USSR. With the latest escalation in the conflict and a vow to eliminate Hamas , it appears that the escalation includes the elimination of Gaza . Those unable to flee are seemingly treated as legitimate targets in what some interpret as a strategy to clear the territory for Israeli expansion. What about Trump’s plan to buy the territory and rebuild? That would involve resettling many refugees, but is that worse than killing them? Trump is turning his focus to the broader Middle East , aiming to unite the “non-violent” actors and build a peace coalition, thereby restraining Iran’s allies (presumed to have UN protection), who are often seen as the root of instability. So why are evangelicals supporting the violence —alongside the Jewish elite— while the Left and Europe begin to reconsider their stance ? Are all Palestinians terrorists? What is the true meaning of “from the River to the Sea” —a call for democracy or a religious conflict between Islam and Christianity? And then there’s the UN, watching? And the new Pope, pleading for aid —but peace talks? Only Trump? Shortly after his inauguration, Chancellor Merz made his mark on German politics by deploying permanent troops to Lithuania— you be the judge —possibly to support allies under the guise of protection. His actions won’t help global stability, and insiders in Germany do not dismiss the possibility of aggression reminiscent of WWII, now reframed under the narrative that Russia is the enemy. He will certainly support Zelensky unconditionally, using the war as justification to rebuild EU military strength. European Union leaders concluded a busy defense-focused week by endorsing a landmark plan to unlock €800 billion ($866 billion) in European military spending—though internal political divisions remain. Nelson Mandela, upon becoming South Africa’s president, emphasized moving forward together—not retaliating for the past. One reason for his divorce was reportedly that his wife had a more radical, vengeance-driven outlook, which he believed was incompatible with building a democratic society. Yes, apartheid was real, but reversing the oppression with retribution only prolongs emotional wounds. One has to ask what is just . Perhaps Trump has a point— crime is rampant . But of course, there are always two sides to a story .
More Posts