Geopolitical Focus – February 2023

February 21, 2023

Geopolitical Focus – February 2023

Although reports on the Ukraine-Russia proxy war in the US have subsided and balloons are flying too high to be identified, one might wonder if Mr. Biden's physical state is hiding more than just a bit of arthritis. Annalena Baerbock, the German counterpart of Blinken, returned from a trip to Finland and was enthusiastic about Finland's nuclear bunkers, which are capable of housing the entire population underground in case of a nuclear attack. She was so impressed that she plans to ask the German government, who can actually protect about 10% (the elites), to follow suit. This is surprising, coming from a member of the Green Party and a peace-loving activist who studied politics and international understanding. She is also among the biggest war-mongers in Germany, according to information from Wikipedia.


As a child, Baerbock grew up with her two sisters and two cousins and joined her parents at anti-war and anti-nuclear power protests organized or supported by the Green Party. She attended the Humboldt School in Hanover and spent an exchange year at Lake Highland Preparatory School in Orlando, Florida, at the age of 16.


It is ironic that two generations after the Russian Army spent 25 million lives to destroy the Third Reich on the East Front, the German never-again-war activists are the loudest in supporting Ukraine, in a world where they have failed greatly to negotiate (the Minsk Treaty). Perhaps they still feel bad that they lost to Russia and are happy that Zelinski is carrying out the duty to restore the feel-good story. There are actually democracies in Europe, such as Hungary, which is called a dictatorship by the EU, but they consulted with the population to decide whether they should actively engage in the war. They decided not to. It remains to be seen if Mr. Biden will sanction them, as he has done with Switzerland, coercing a neutral country to deliver weapons. It is worth noting that the Green and Socialist parties are all in, and solidarity is in their blood. That the socialist members actually favor Russia as an ideological ally can wait.


The Munich Security Conference opened with a video conference from President Zelinski, predicting victory over "Goliath" Russia to save Western civilization. However, at home, he censors the press, removes opponents, and the British accuse him of firing ammunition into no man's land, thus wasting resources while always demanding more weapons. While Zelinski claims the war has killed 200,000 soldiers, the British say Russia lost 50,000, which would leave 150,000 Ukrainian dead. But according to Western news, only Russians die. The Munich Security Conference does not include Russia but rather a set of war-oriented interests waiting for Russia to fall so they can prey on the resources. They have all forgotten about Napoleon and Hitler and are repeating what led to WWI, where everyone talked about war and no one about peace. Meanwhile, Mr. Stoltenberg, the NATO commander, stated that the war started in 2014 when Russia entered Crimea, but he said nothing about the Maidan coup, which really started the confrontation under the guidance of the CIA.


The next escalation point is that Europe and the US are ramping up the production of ammunition and preparing for the delivery of fighter jets. Russia has 3,800 aircraft, with 1,500 fighter jets, so the economy will likely recover with solar panels and wind power. However, until the multi-trillion-dollar investment package impacts the economy, war will likely do it to avoid a global recession. This administration is trigger-happy against everyone except China, which is at least worth considering given Hunter and the rest of the family's potential influence on the conflict with Ukraine and the soft gloves on China.


Where will this all lead? Will the US lead Europe to split up Russia into smaller countries, allowing for greater access to its resources? Will a new EU and EEU, led by Zelinski, emerge to counter China? This seems like a long way off. After all, South America has more strategic resources for an electric world. Russia may have gas, oil, and coal, but it lacks lithium.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.