What did the world, especially Europe and Germany, expect —Ukraine to win the war by destroying Russian infrastructure, especially oil production? Yes, some people may have a tough time getting gasoline, but the side effect is that support for Putin goes up and the destabilization remains a dream, contrary to some hopefuls. The more Europe and the West put sanctions on Russia, the more links will be created in the China–India–Russia coalition, and Europe will at the end be the geopolitical loser , setting the base for industrial ruin. Germany already has a social government, and should poverty become an issue, nationalists—not AfD but the current elite establishment—will put people to work in the defense industry, and another Adolf may arise to fuel enough hate for communism to move east and help the AZOV brothers conquer Russia one more time for total destruction or total defeat, for an isle called Crimea, as both at that point are autocracies or dictatorships fighting for democracy. Here you have some distorted views —call it democracy, some may call it autocracy when you suppress 26% of the votes.
They call it far right because the left moved left, the middle held steady, so they are far right—illusionists. And here is a reminder of where all the Jews live around the globe, so the US has the highest political interest to defend Israel, or by the numbers, one year's worth of immigration under Biden. Why not take all the Jews, make the Pope move to Jerusalem as an enclave to Rome, and return to pre-1948 borders? Who wants to stay can, but the Brits probably would object—another foreign feather out of their cap. Catholics believe God knew exactly what he was doing when he moved the seat of the Church to Rome away from the middle east during the first generation after Christ. Well, the Brits knew better? But at the end, let's hope negotiations will prevail, and reason will be the winner. But the carefully choreographed imagery of Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin embracing each other sent a powerful message to Washington as Trump seeks to contain Beijing , to break Russia's bond with China , and to pry India away from Russian oil .
What drives NATO, and who are the leaders ? Here is an interesting take from Jeffrey Sachs. Unfortunately, his opinion is pretty much censored in the US: Every President since then—Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden—has pursued the neocon agenda of US hegemony, leading the US into perpetual wars of choice, including Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Ukraine, as well as relentless eastward expansion of NATO, despite a clear US and German promise in 1990 to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch eastward. But the neocons and anti-Trump warmongers are still operating the hegemon. And did Europe make a bad choice here , or was he just a tool of the neocons? He aggressively pushed NATO in new directions that extended far beyond the traditional roles of containment of the Soviet Union and directing the Cold War in Europe. [8] His term ended on 30 September 2014. He was the first former prime minister since Paul-Henri Spaak of Belgium in 1961 to become Secretary General of NATO.
Peace talks so far have provided no results in the Ukraine–Russia conflict (translate), and some people see the reason in the point that the EU simply cannot let the two dictators negotiate, as that is seen as a catastrophe for Europe, so they all waved their hands and derailed the train, but they may be left with all the carnage. Because if the big hit succeeds, the two presidents agree on serious negotiations, and a potential peace becomes more likely, the EU will be faced with a shambles. And not only because it has led the member states into an economic and political impasse in the last three to five years, but also because the annoying questions of how to proceed will then come back on the agenda. And the same magazine claims that Russia is lost to Asia, which would be a disaster for the US hegemon. However, eased relations (translate) US/Russia could be a benefit for all, including Europe. Even an escalation of the Ukraine war to a European war with Russia, which cannot be ruled out, would offer the US significant political and economic advantages. Second, the US could try to end the Ukraine war and return to normal relations with Russia. This would offer the US the strategic advantage of breaking Russia's close alliance with China, into which the West has virtually pushed the Russian
Quietly killing people in the Middle East: Classified intelligence from the Israeli military suggests that 83% of the total deaths in Gaza have been civilians, according to a new report — which the IDF has slammed as "incorrect." Defending Israel for a lasting peace, and in the process kill more civilians than Hamas , and the rest to starve. But no option for refugee status, unlike the Ukrainians (numbers from 2024). And meanwhile the radical settlers, praying for war while dodging it : Military service is compulsory for most Jewish Israelis, both men and women. The exemption for the ultra-Orthodox, known in Hebrew as Haredim, has long been resented by the rest of the Jewish population. But the nearly two-year war in Gaza has turned an irritant into a political crisis that is deepening divisions in Israeli society and imperiling Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fragile coalition. And stealing land in the name of Jesus —what a world. It is still an evolving but a non-resolving issue —just ask the settler, Hamas kind of thinking as well.
Ever heard the term election interference, and maybe it is best to accuse the others of meddling with the cookie jar? Perhaps the CIA has a definite say on this topic: 2014 in the Maidan coup , 2022 in Brazil (translate), perhaps at the order of George Soros. Some even think Washington was accomplice to the Ukraine war. According to Benz, between 2019 and 2023, USAID specifically funded organizations, media houses and left-wing movements in Brazil to build a "censorship ecosystem". This was aimed at suppressing conservative voices, especially those of Bolsonaro and his supporters. But now, a months-long investigation reveals that: the FBI has helped Brazil censor its citizens; the Soroses' "Open Society Foundation" is spending heavily to promote censorship in Brazil; and Brazil has a secret judicial police force that exists specifically to spy upon and censor people deemed to be spreading false information. Together, the FBI, the Soroses, and the Supreme Court of Brazil are engaged in a direct assault on the free speech protections of both the Brazilian and U.S. Constitutions.
Klaus Schwab territory goes hedge fund, as the founder of the WEF, after the alleged abuse, quietly triggers a change atop the organization. For all good measure, Larry Fink is given another tool to manipulate clients to his massive portfolio, but no fear—he will operate completely independently for the global elite. Or do we think WEF will now be philanthropic, or the highest bidder gets the most exposure, or is that in-kind money like college donations? But even there, you get at least a brick for $200 or a name on the stadium. The organization offers different membership levels , including strategic partners, industry partners, and technology pioneers, each with its own set of benefits and fees. Wonder what the transfer fee was into Klaus's slush fund?
