US News: June, 2025 - Immigration, Social Policy, and Institutional Responses
A new global world order is emerging after the WEF kind of failed with its global leadership program to produce change agents. George Soros is now creating a global network of transforming leaders , and if you follow his Open Society philosophy and the actions of his sponsored groups, you may notice some Che Guevara's influence along with it. It is interesting to follow this program and wonder what “grades” you might receive. If you follow the philosophy of the Open Society , you might conclude that Soros believes the U.S. has functioned like a dictatorship for years—or perhaps that it’s the only country in the world where a shaman and an “evil communist” could undermine global power. To what end? Although Soros, as a hedge fund manager, may not qualify as a communist, his donations certainly seem to be fueling that trend.
If you study Soros’s activities in immigration , justice , and politics , you’ll see a strong connection to the attendees at his son’s wedding to a Clinton ally—essentially a sellout to the Democratic crème de la crème. The Open Society seems, in essence, to be a vision for a one-party global communist system without borders. Looking back at the BLM summer and ICE protests, it appears the shouts of “Nazi” and “fascist” may have originated from the Marxist movement within the U.S.—a Democratic Party operating under the guise of communism.
Here’s a reminder of the Soros-coordinated activities and groups —a potential threat to national security, perhaps, but certainly a driver of civil unrest.
What are the No King protests, other than an extension of the Trump hate , fueled by the Soros socialist faithful? All of it claims to support democracy but seems aimed at creating a Marxist totalitarian system. According to the organizers, 1.2–1.8% of the population participated, disrupting the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary parade—the same percentage that supports men competing in women’s sports.
Hate, powerlessness, and hopelessness seem to be the fuel keeping the current TDS going , with many pretending to be powerless and hopeless, resulting in a doomsday mindset and perpetual resistance—almost like being “a rebel without a cause.” The answer appears to be yes: this has moved beyond politics and compromise into a pure power game , driven by gamesmanship and a herd mentality of malicious compliance, from immigration to global affairs. There seems to be no clear goal in the eyes of the resistance. Having enjoyed free rein under the previous president, what exactly are they fighting for—values without clear definition?
It’s the resistance’s choice to label their opponents as Nazis, fascists, dictators, or any other derogatory terms, while associating them with Iranian clerics, Hamas, Antifa, and other “resistance” fighters—all of whom are deeply undemocratic. Yet they’re fueled by the media and power elites who seemingly have no “compass” but hate, or at best a compass of Woke, unions, and illegal activities, and who are willing to burn cities for their cause.
Hate is a powerfully strong verb, and it's one you should probably save for those things you really detest, that you have a passionately negative feeling about. An exception is when you use it in a sentence like, "I hate to bother you, but I'd like another cup of coffee." In this case, you're not using the word hate literally, but in more of a polite way; you simply want to emphasize that you're not trying to bother someone while still getting what you want.
Immigration and the legal system. Here are all the options you have to enter the U.S. Like any other sovereign state, the U.S. has the right to refuse entry if someone is deemed “unfit.” Historically, in any country, people have diverse roots, but their new country becomes home. The U.S. is no different; people identify first as American, though first and second generations often maintain emotional ties to their “home country.” As an immigrant, choosing this country as your home means respecting its laws and securing all the necessary documents—from visas to passports or green cards—for permanent residency.
If you enter the U.S. without proper documentation, it is simply against the law, yes. You might possess a government stamp somewhere or acquire documents in the underground market that grant a quasi-legal status, but that’s not a permanent solution. To hide behind faith, politics, or humanitarian arguments to demand legal status or amnesty is akin to student loan forgiveness—it’s favoritism and political maneuvering, or willful chaos. Here’s a summary about immigration over the last couple of years.
Why can’t labor unions and big corporations, including the service and farming sectors, lobby more aggressively for work visas? California, for example, could deploy its army of lawyers, currently fighting for the undocumented, to the border to fill all vacancies in strawberry picking and Hollywood nanny jobs. But here’s the answer : you simply need to call an immigration lawyer to your workplace. So, there’s a solution for all workforce issues, but vested interests would lose their advantages—either cheap labor or future voters.
If you are an asylum or refugee seeker—not one of those smuggled into the U.S. —how can you maintain control without borders? Anyone crossing the border and then released into U.S. territory has still committed a violation, and deportation remains on the table whenever they’re caught. As of May 2025, the border is officially closed , and within another three months, the debate will likely shift toward focusing on Dreamers and those labeled “illegals” who have become integrated into U.S. society and its workforce. Despite this fact, no pathway currently exists for most Dreamers to gain lawful residence or citizenship in the U.S. What is DACA ? Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ( DACA ) is a program that provides work authorization and protection from deportation to certain Dreamers . Here’s a read.
Will New York revert to Cuomo, or is there a chance New Yorkers might elect someone more like a De Blasio-style leftist? Mamdani began identifying as a democratic socialist after Bernie Sanders ’s 2016 presidential campaign. [21] He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. [30] [35] Could he become New York’s next mayor? It’s astonishing, considering De Blasio’s devastation of the city, that Eric Adams emerged as a tougher candidate, and now shifting back leftward would be surprising. Still, as in national Democratic politics, alternatives remain limited and far apart—a recipe for continued division and resentment. Here’s the latest info on the candidates.
Social media is often blamed for dividing our country. There’s certainly an argument that anyone can now find a “safe space” for their views. For example, on Facebook or LinkedIn, disagreeing with an author’s post often earns you a swift rebuke and exclusion. So people simply migrate to groups that embrace their comments, rants, or hatred—and just like that, they’ve found their safe space and comfort zone. Sadly, that may not fit the true definition of being democratic.
Here’s another perspective on what’s driving political polarization.
