Economics – August 2023

September 1, 2023

Economics – August 2023

While the United States boasts about its Oil and Liquefied Gas exports to Europe, and European political pundits applaud their decision, there is a significant downside to this. It renders the European, especially German, industries less competitive. In the event that Ukraine were to halt gas deliveries – a possibility if Germany were to cease complying with US directives – the consequences could be severe.


If no Russian gas flows through Ukraine to Europe, there is a risk of Germany's economic standstill. Economics Minister Robert Habeck warned of this as early as June 14, 2023  in  an article in the newspaper Die Welt. Literally, it says: "If Russian gas did not come to Eastern Europe to the extent that it still flows through Ukraine, what was agreed in Europe applies: Before the people there freeze, we would have to reduce or even shut down our industry."

The statement at the time is interesting in the current context: the government of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky does not want to participate in talks with Russia on the transit of Russian gas through Ukrainian territory. «We will most certainly not participate in talks with the Russians, this is absolutely clear,» said Ukrainian Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko.

While no one is openly discussing sanctions anymore, they have indeed proven effective for the United States. In contrast, Germany is facing a hefty price to pay, potentially putting the entire European Union in a precarious position. It's worth noting that while the EU is increasing taxes, it continues to spend lavishly. Meanwhile, Germany needs to pass its own industrial bill to weather a significant recession. This situation appears to be part of Bidenomics, an effort to strengthen ties between Germany and the US, possibly with the expectation that Germany will invest more in the US.


Regarding BRIC and its impact on the future, as the US solidifies its status as a global democratic leader, it seems that the free world may be contracting due to questionable economic decisions like sanctions and interference in global conflicts. The Ukraine War raises questions about whether it's primarily about promoting democracy or securing economic interests in Ukraine's resources and, ultimately, weakening Russia and gaining access to its natural resources. One might consider the evolution of trade from the early ages and ponder whether the proliferation of associations, regulations, and influence has led to what we've lost. Is it not possible for organizations like the WTO or similar regulatory constructs to effectively lead complex negotiations and provide a calming influence?


BRIC, as discussed in this article, may become more attractive to certain European countries if the Ukraine War drags on. With its connections in Africa and South America, BRIC could potentially become a formidable force countering Western alliances in the next 15 years and challenging Western influence or dominance on the world stage.


As for the United States, despite the fanfare and investments, inflation persists, leading to weakening consumer confidence. Nevertheless, the overall economic picture remains somewhat positive, with a growth rate of perhaps around 1%. Recent delegations, including Secretary Raimondo's, have been engaging in discussions with China, and some financial elites are advocating for the removal of Trump's tariffs. Germany's reluctance or economic impossibility to distance itself from China, coupled with BRIC's growing influence, might indicate that the US elite is concerned that China's progress could proceed without significant US involvement. This doesn't seem to be a position of strength.


Another intriguing article you mentioned pertains to the Biden administration's emphasis on the effectiveness of sanctions, despite the Ruble's devaluation. Interestingly, the Russian economy still outpaces that of the EU. With various companies withdrawing from Russia, it raises questions about whether they underestimated Russia's ability to manage without their presence. The economic impact of the war, with hundreds of thousands of casualties in Ukraine and Russia, prompts one to ponder the cost and purpose of it all. And as for the source of cheap energy, it remains a topic of interest.

Despite the sanctions regime, Europe is importing record volumes of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG), the Financial Times reports. In the first seven months of this year, Belgium and Spain were the second and third largest buyers. Only China purchased more LNG from its neighboring country. This was the result of an analysis by the NGO Global Witness.

Overall, European liquefied natural gas imports from Russia increased by 40 percent between January and July compared to 2021, before the start of the Ukraine war. The jump is so high because the EU states previously mainly purchased pipeline gas. Nevertheless, the increase is surprisingly high, as Russia's LNG exports have increased by only 6 percent overall.

Part of the Economy and perhaps the reason GDP growth kept steady? Global military spending has reached a new high. Mainly due to the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, they rose by 3.7 percent to 2.24 trillion dollars in 2022 after adjusting for inflation, the equivalent of around 2.04 trillion euros, according to the Stockholm peace research institute SIPRI. For the eighth year in a row, the countries of the world invested more money in the military than in the previous year.

The USA remains the clear leader, Germany seventh. "The continuous increase in global military spending in recent years is a sign that we live in an increasingly uncertain world," said Sipri researcher Nan Tian. In response to the deteriorating security environment, states strengthened their militaries - and they did not expect this environment to change for the better in the near future.

And now what is the word about Ukraine Corruption? Was Mr. Biden asking to remove the wrong Prosecutor, so that the channels do not get interrupted? 

Nearly all surveyed Ukrainians — 89% — in a newly released survey said corruption was the country's most serious problem after the war against Russia. The poll came out as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy launched an investigation into bribery related to military recruitment.

October 10, 2025
The Democratic Party Shutdown Strategy: We've got ANTIFA and Weathermen in Congress, and a shutdown to please the 5%—is that a winning strategy? Perhaps a clear indication that the Democratic Party no longer exists. It is a Kimmel–Colbert–Springsteen sound-setting orchestra, with tunes from Rosie, Joy Reid, The View and Psaki, and MSNBC and other leftist commentators. Schumer and Jeffries are no longer relevant; the squad rule is on. Thank you, Bernie and Soros, but the shutdown will hopefully silence all government waste, a shutdown DOGE? If we miss you, we let you know, but for now, it is the Republicans in favor 70:30. Here's an explainer: fight, fight, fight against Trump—the only reasoning the Democrats offer these days. We need to elect politicians, not litigators and Soros activists. Axios has reported throughout the year how Hill Democrats have been besieged by an increasingly angry base demanding that they " fight harder " and "do something" about Trump. – In February, shortly after President Trump's inauguration, it was voters blowing up Democrats' phone lines with demands to "fight back" against DOGE. – In March, it was angry crowds gathered at town halls to chew Democrats out for purportedly not doing enough to resist Trump, which some lawmakers compared to the rise of the Tea Party. – By July, Democratic lawmakers were expressing concerns about their base demanding they put themselves in harm's way to draw attention to the administration's use of physical force. But it looks like the Democrats are united, with presidential candidates proposing and supporting the radical stance. Just wonder: Gavin Newsom urged Democrats to stand firm amid the government shutdown Friday, saying, "You lose leverage, you lose this country." ANTIFA leverage? The shutdown —essential and non-essential—or why are there government non-essential functions? Are the SPLC (no leftists), ACLU, ANTIFA , and the Redneck Revolt all part of non-essential feeding grounds? And what about academia ? Or are we at the start of a John Brown revolution, with unidentified actors/founders ? Portland, Oregon: Portland Oregon —why is ICE and the Trump administration so focused on Portland? It looks like an Eldorado to live in the state and city , but also a hotspot of the rebellion, because the elite rulers use it to provide what? A one-party state for many years . Oregon hasn't always had a lack of affordable housing, costly and poor-performing public schools, high taxes and heavy regulations on businesses, rampant drug addiction and homeless campers everywhere. Whom do you blame for all of this? Perhaps because people move there to live a hippy life—I mean a happy life—or the political mix. The people in rural areas don't care if the cities get waxed by anti-fascists. A 2008 analysis by political statistician Nate Silver on states' political ideology noted that the state's conservatives were the most conservative of any state (more so than Utah or Tennessee) and that the state's liberals were more liberal than any state (more so than Vermont or D.C.). For now, a Trump judge ruled in favor of ANTIFA . Let the demolition go on—happy winter. 'Justice has been served': Gov. Tina Kotek, others praise judge's ruling blocking troops to Portland. FBI Political Affiliations: Is the FBI politically Republican-charged? There is some social media claim that since the 1950s, no Democrat was leading the FBI. If you are counting James Comey, Robert Mueller, and Christopher Wray as Republicans, you perhaps need to note there is a litany of Trump haters in the Republican Party. But for good measure, it is called the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and nominations are approved by Congress and controlled by the AG and the US intelligence committee. Wonder why this is a question when Trump is president? Looks to me, with 90% lawyers on committees, like a straightforward legal matter. And shifting priorities —left and right have extreme activism . It is just a question of who you ask, so why not check them both accurately? But mental sickness is not part of an ideology—unless some publishers are politically biased.